Maybe fighters that are $100 million a copy weren't such a great idea.
post
My government is still going strong towards this support heavy Trumpfuckistain garbage.
But then again, maintaining local air superiority is in the hands of ground based anti-air missiles and allied neigbouring contrys airforce.
The hyper-advanced technological marvel that is hyper dependent on China had readiness issues while the government that made them is one-sidedly beefing with China for no discernible military reason?
I'm shocked! Who could have seen this coming.
Do we want the modern equivalent of WW2 German equipment that work spectacularly when available and properly functioning, or American and to an extent Soviet equipment that wasn't amazing in comparison but was available, with a whole domestic mass production ecosystem ready behind it?
Do we really want fighter jets that only perform well when the supplier country is happy with us, which could change every 4 years? It could do everything you'd ever want a fighter jet to do but if it's not there when you need then its capabilities don't really matter.
Look at the Strait of Hormuz and the US Navy. They have modular and multifunctional ships, can clear mines, move fast, hold their own against other ships, deliver some cargo, fight against submarines, and do most stuff you'd want with a war ship by changing out the modules.
Yet with the moron-in-chief being totally unprepared for the Epstein Fury operation he was roped into by Israel expecting an easy win, didn't have enough of those all-capable ships in the area to be able to clear mines or escort other ships if needed, which was by my read of the situation, a large part of the reason behind the initial insurance shock.
Other than moving money around, why do we care about fighter planes anymore when we've reached sufficient drone technology. Give a hoot, buy a drone.
all 4 comments