Only 1 out of over 740,000 petitions has ever directly succeeded in changing government policy.

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

Have you seen most of the petitions? Between bloodthirsty gammons calling for public hangings to be brought back and people whose mates think they’re a legend calling on the government to legislate something frivolous or physically impossible, there’s a lot of rubbish there.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    In the authoritarian playbook, one of the most important things is to continuously demonstrate to masses that they're incapable of handling their own matters.

    In case of petitions websites, I think they're meant as an outlet for people to channel energy into so that they don't have any left to organize politically for real change. People do intuitively understand this and largely stay away, leaving a few loons with time on their hands to repeatedly fill the platforms with garbage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago*

    I believe, though I was young at the time, that the petition to not go to Iraq was the largest of it's time. I believe that the peaceful protest against going to Iraq was also the largest of it's time.

    I should probably confirm those beliefs as they're the foundation of my belief that petitions and peaceful protests are useless against the forces of capital. Capital was going to make big money going to Iraq, New Labour are a party of capital, we went to Iraq.

  • source
  • 13 comments in c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk view that post
    [–] 32 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Because democracy was always fake. Hope one day we will reach real democracy

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Sack all the politicians, they fail at the key part of their jobs: representing the voters. Instead, they represent the biggest donors to the party LLC.

    Let everyone vote on everything an MP votes on themselves, directly. We don't need a "representative" to travel to Westminster and vote on our behalf, communication technology makes them obsolete.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 18 points 3 months ago
    [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    The original criticism of the .gov petitions was that it was a distraction from meaningful social action that forced the government to change.

  • source
  • [+] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    We should start a petition to make the government take petitions more seriously.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    To be fair, a lot of the petitions that get uploaded are either dumb or just jokes. That doesn't excuse the government treating the serious ones that have huge public support as if they're also jokes, of course

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago*

    Yeah it makes the whole thing pointless, it just seems to show how little the UK government actually cares about it's citizens and their opinions.

    This site is used to humour us like giving a child an unplugged controller to play your game.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    There was one????!!

    What was it?

  • source
  • [+] -8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    To be fair, 739,999 of the petitions were memes, Karen's or the woke brigade

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment