all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 3 points 5 months ago
[–] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

@PugJesus As someone from Turkiye with a background in defense technology, this hits differently. What strikes me most is the engineering philosophy: the combination of plate and chainmail isn't just aesthetic — it's a deliberate trade-off between protection and mobility. The same tension we still wrestle with in modern armor design, 500 years later.The sunburst umbone at the center is both a structural element and a statement. Ottoman craftsmenship.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    @PugJesus Unlike ahistorial boob armor, pot-belly armor appears to be real (just kidding, but it sort of looks like it)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    So would that be worn by like a Janissary or Sipahi?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 5 months ago

    Probably not by Janissaries. Janissaries were generally archers (early period) or musketeers (most of their existence), and heavy armor is more a burden than a help for those disciplines.

    Very likely an option for Sipahis, though, who were noted to fight in heavy armor!

  • source
  • parent