The NHS is granting staff from companies including Palantir ‘unlimited access’ to identifiable patient data while working on its FDP.

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 5 months ago

Obviously bad but wasn't this a breaking news story from several days ago? What's new?

  • source
  • 13 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 48 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Wtf there is literally zero upside to this

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 5 months ago

    Oh great. And no possible way to opt out of this either, aside from having never used the NHS - which for the average UK citizen is borderline impossible.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago
    [–] 16 points 5 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Because New Labour hates British citizens and thinks they're disgusting little worms who are only worthy of contempt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    It would be the same under any government.
    They already did stuff like that and gave NHS patient files to USSA companies.
    After all, the UK is part of the 5 eyes.
    The inner circle of the western imperialist scumbaggery.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    Can citizens who's data was given in an unlimited fashion to Palantir get unlimited access to Palantir funds? So long as we spend some funds to pay legal obligations like salaries we could treat their funds the same way they treat our data, how ever the fuck we want.

  • source
  • 12 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 68 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    What could possibly go wrong…

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Maybe they'll now make sure every patient gets the treatment they need?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    The implication that patient data is being "sent to Palantir" is misleading; the data remains in UK systems, but NHS England (not the wider UK-wide NHS) has granted Palantir contractors "unlimited" admin access to view raw, identifiable patient records directly. This creates a dangerous loophole where external US staff can bypass standard, granular privacy checks simply because obtaining individual permissions was deemed "too inconvenient."

    This is a fundamentally poor decision. Granting sweeping administrative privileges to a foreign intelligence-linked firm is a lazy shortcut that prioritises engineering ease over patient safety. By dismantling strict access controls to save time, NHS England has unnecessarily exposed millions of patients to risk, undermining the very principle of knowing exactly who accesses sensitive health data.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Right, and Palantir will immediately copy that data. So effectively there's no difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    Just like with DOGE. Why did everyone think the first thing they did was scrape all the info? Its so if Trump gets the boot they already have it. Nothing is getting just "viewed" nothing is getting deleted.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    Oh yeah this is gonna work out great

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago

    Wots all this then?

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    that's nothing, china has 3 complete volumes of my dick pics

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/world view that post
    [–] 9 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    This headline sounds like the start of a decent Bond film.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The article glaringly lacks saying why

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    The NHS has a wealth of data which makes conducting studies across large population groups possible. For example Dexamethasone as a treatment for COVID was identified thanks to having access to a medical history and outcome data across the NHS.

    Even so there has not historically been a unified data storage solution as information is split between GPs and individual hospital trusts. Previous attempts to have a single system failed due to complexity and cost overruns. The current solution is the federated data platform (FDP): https://www.england.nhs.uk/digitaltechnology/nhs-federated-data-platform/ which attempts to interoperate with multiple primary data sources to help clinicians access patient records as well as help with resource and service planning.

    I assume the Palentir system is involved with providing some sort of AI insights into that data store.

  • source
  • parent