no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
3 comments in c/science@beehaw.org view that post
[–] 5 points 6 months ago

Protected area but these kinds of activities. I'm confused. Allowing that is the opposite of protection.

I wonder how the subsidies compare to those for more healthy fishing. Current seems like a tragedy.

Good to read about phase out, but even now four more years seems quite long. I guess it's a matter of which side you look at it from.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    2% of the animal protein consumed in all of Europe […] provides an estimated social value of €2.46 billion per year.

    Sooo that shouldn’t have been a positive offset against the environmental harm done fishe

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 1 comment in c/science@slrpnk.net view that post
    [–] [S] 3 points 6 months ago

    2% of the animal protein consumed in all of Europe […] provides an estimated social value of €2.46 billion per year.

    Sooo that shouldn’t have been a positive offset against the environmental harm done fishe

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/science@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] [S] 2 points 6 months ago

    2% of the animal protein consumed in all of Europe […] provides an estimated social value of €2.46 billion per year.

    Sooo that shouldn’t have been a positive offset against the environmental harm done fishe

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/marine@r1b.it view that post
    [–] [S] 3 points 2 days ago

    2% of the animal protein consumed in all of Europe […] provides an estimated social value of €2.46 billion per year.

    Sooo that shouldn’t have been a positive offset against the environmental harm done fishe

  • source