all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Fell for the usual trap of teaching something complex. If you teach a simplified version, you just teach... the simplified version. You didn't teach the actual complex thing and the learners will eventually still have to learn that

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I’m guessing it hasn’t been deemed noteworthy enough to add to Unicode alongside Shavian.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago

    I posted this in Longreads and found out about it from the linked Guardian article. I had never heard of it previously

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Interesting. I don't know that this particular solution seems great but English is a complete mess when it comes to knowing the pronunciation of a word from reading it alone for sure.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    My Latin American friend took one look at an English sentence written in this script and said it was a lot easier for them to understand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments