I did not see this coming. I thought the "recent" new driver NTFS3 is the ultimate driver. You can bet phoronix will do performance comparisons once it is available in mainstream. Is performance the only reason or are there other technical reasons for creating this new driver?
post
replies:
4 comments in c/linux@programming.dev view that post
there are problems with the old driver? Man you think at some point a tecnology is just complete, but apparently no.
replies:
permalink
fedilink
source
parent
permalink
fedilink
source
parent
permalink
fedilink
source
parent
I think it's mostly maintenance issues, the maintainers being employees of the company that originally wrote and donated the driver, so there's been a backlog of bugs that have sat unfixed.
This new driver on the other hand builds off the preexisting kernel support for NTFS, and the maintainer seems better equipped to respond to bugs in a timely manner.
There's ntfs3 and ntfs-3g, both have their own problems. I wonder if the new one will make it possible to run fsck scans
Technology is literally never complete, especially when it's code based on reverse engineering of a proprietary format...
all 3 comments