all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

My guess - the biggest factors in height are genetics and childhood nutrition.

Children born in China and India in the 70s would have a decent chance of experiencing malnutrition, stunting their growth. This created the space to explain the increase in heights seen in these countries over time, as they benefitted from technological advancements, more liberal governments, and the increased wealth from integrating into global supply chains.

Germany, the UK, and the US had already mostly solved their food insecurity problems by 1970, and so saw little increase in height in that period. The differences in height between these nations is probably due to greater genetic diversity in the latter two populations. Northern Europeans tend to be taller than global average, but the US has a significant Latino minority, and the UK has populations from its former colonies. I'm guessing the dip/flattening in the US's line around 2000 was mostly due to the surge in Mexican migrants around that time.

I don't know what tf happened in the Netherlands.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    The benefits of a nutritionally complete youth?

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago
    [–] -5 points 6 months ago (15 children)

    how to manipulate graphs 101

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (13 children)

    I mean everything is very clearly labeled and only 1 axis is cut, because without the cut you wouldn't see many differences in the top part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 6 months ago (12 children)

    wouldn’t see many differences in the top part.

    you would see them, they just wouldn't look as massive as they do before you notice that the y axis does not start at zero. which is exactly the manipulation 101 i am talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago* (8 children)

    Who is zero centimeters tall though? Why would you start at zero when the data doesnt start at zero.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Stop making sense!

    Good news everyone, this graph should start at zero as we are comparing humans to tardigrades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    this graph doesn't compare heights, it compares speed of change and it is heavily distorted in this representation. you think you are delivering some sick burn, but you are just making fool of yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    It's not speed, it's the height over time. The derivative of this is the speed, and then the axis in this case should not start at 0, it should start at negative because there are periods where the speed is negative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    It’s not speed, it’s the height over time

    yeah, it is not speed, it is unit over time, so, wait for it... speed.

    The derivative of this is the speed

    and its visual perception is distorted due to the truncated axis.

    it should start at negative because there are periods where the speed is negative.

    "where the speed is negative"? wait, what, i thought this is not speed - as per your first sentence. also, the axis should start at zero, because... at some point the height of the person was negative?

    well thank you for your input 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    Height as a function of time results in... Height. Delta height divided by Delta time is average speed. This is basic math.

    If this was speed, there would be points of negative speed, when height is lower at a greater time.

    I'm going to assume you're just a troll, nobody can be so dumb.

    Edit: just as an observation, if you want to look at the speed, the truncated axis is irrelevant, because the intersection value is derived to 0. You really don't know this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child)

    If this was speed, there would be points of negative speed, when height is lower at a greater time.

    there is no need for the height axis to start below zero just because there is negative speed at some point. i am going to assume you are just dumb, because i do believe people can be that dumb.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 39 comments in c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 46 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Wow its almost like mean height is affected by poverty and nutrition or something

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 6 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    The Dutch are incredible. Once upon a time they were the shortest people in Europe. Now they are the tallest in the entire world.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    Crazy! Did the small chinese hight come from malnourishment or hard labor? Otherwise that increase would be hard to describe right?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago (6 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    This is really fascinating!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    welwp, at 186cm i'm about average in The Netherlands.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    It shows americans growing after a decline, this study from 2025 shows they're still getting smaller

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)
  • [+] -3 points 6 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    You should add a /s unless you are serious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    What a weird set of countries.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Where's the rest of Europe, where's Africa, and where's the Middle East ???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)