all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I mean, they're already helping to screw up the economy and the climate and privacy everywhere. How much more offensive can they get without just sticking LLMs in murderbots—oh, I see what the question is.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    "ChatGPT, what should I do about millions of people being pissed at me for ruining so, so many things? They're so mad, someone threw a moltov cocktail at my house!"

    "Give away $2 billion of your $3 billion to unions or similar causes."

    SamA: "Nyah!" (Throws $20,000 laptop, then pulls another one out of the pile)

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    "AI chatbots.... Assemble! (some suggestions)

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Considering his home was attacked, and he has a child, can you blame him for wanting to be safe?

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 12 points 6 months ago

    They already are on the offensive. Consuming our water, polluting the environment for chat bots. The question is really if the timeline continues to accelerate on the information side of the offensive.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago*

    They are already on the offensive. They are the aggressors leading the way enshitifying the internet, destroying the environment, fuelling hyperinflation by defrauding investors and enabling fascist regimes. Fuck these c-bags

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    If they wish. We have less to lose each day. Fuck them.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Everyone who thinks he deserves this because of his connections to AI instead of his wealth is a moron.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/motherjones@ibbit.at view that post
    [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Ah yes the poor defenseless AI CEOs. When will they begin to fight back?

    Fuck. Off. This is some bullshit headline.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    timm is the name of the package to be worried about, especially if you have messed with offline models.

  • source