all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

You can't claim to be decentralized and also extort people with a shutdown donation scheme in the same breath.

The decentralized private messaging app

If we are unable to reach our funding goal within this period, the Session Technology Foundation (STF) will be forced to shut down.

Both of these things can't be true.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Doesn't "decentralized" describe that application's architecture? It means it doesn't depend on central servers to send and receive messages. It's not a claim about the organization that maintains it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    If a single organization controls it but the architecture is over a large area then it's distributed.

    Would you say someone who uses cloud flare is using a decentralized architecture?

  • source
  • parent
  • 73 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.world view that post
    18 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    12 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    4 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post