all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

That said, there are many odious regimes in the world and we do not go to war with all of them.

I feel like so much of the debate misses this forest for the trees. Sure, X regime is awful. How does valued ally Saudi compare? It's at best an often-decisive factor in whether to be nice to someone or not.

Edit: Another good one:

There is a frequent mistake, often from folks who deal in economics, to assume that countries will give up on wars when the economics turn bad.

Even if you only care about economics, continuing the war just has to be personally cheaper for an official than ending the war. And then there's tons of coercion, ego and ideology in the mix as well, and sometimes raw irrationality.

Early on in this, there were oil traders talking about how nothing will even disrupt oil because it's too important. That's replacing history with a fanfic you wrote, basically. Same vibe as the 90's when the world decided free markets always become a democracy.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    They get fantastically accurate results about what they study, which is large-scale voluntary exchange. Much more so than the other social sciences. The trick is just that war isn't voluntary exchange (although it does include it), so other disciplines become really important when it breaks out.

  • source
  • parent
  • 6 comments in c/geopolitics@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I'm getting strong Neoliberal/Zionist vibes from the author. Was not pleasant to read their post.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Oh totally, but I find admissions from people whose biases lie with the empire are most valuable. It's not that he wants these things to happen, and cherry picking facts for the narrative. He's upset the empire is crumbling, but he has enough intellectual integrity to acknowledge that it is happening.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    He seems to be missing the point that Iran is a close ally of China. And the US absolutely wants to isolate China from its allies.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 4 points 7 months ago

    I agree, the US wants to prevent a Eurasian bloc from forming at all costs. Iran and Afghanistan are a big part of the BRI which connect China with West Asia. And that's why the US has been destabilizing the region obsessively.

  • source
  • parent
  • 1 comment in c/general@lemmy.today view that post
    [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Admittedly, I don't know much about Iran. I've heard they have a lot of mountains so land invasions would be a nightmare. Also there was that one time...reagan sold missiles to Iran to pay for a war in South. Thanks american dad. 👍

  • source