all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Nice art skills! Too bad it's advertising for corporate intellectual property.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Kind of somewhat? It's much more obviously satire. I haven't thought of that product or brand in years but... now I am. Net loss in the struggle I feel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    On a superficial level I can understand how that viewpoint is arrived at. One of the wonders of art is it can be interpreted from various perspectives and (as a general rule) will reflect that perspective or world view

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    Well yeah, wasn’t gonna mention it but the first painting kind of glorifies a fascist soldier, unless there’s something I can’t see. Is there satire? A reclamation of power in some way? Does Lucas the writer think stormtroopers should be cool?

    To be honest, I think the tradition of culture jamming is fantastic, I used to subscribe to adbusters, and I think if you pull corporate IP for your art, it should go hard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Could be as simple as the artist enjoyed Star Wars as a kid? I don't know them personally I just don't think it is a homage to a fascist ideology. Unlikely a mural on Leake Street is covertly sponsored by Disney executives

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment