What?? Using fancy autocorrects "trained" on reddit and stackoverflow yields bad code??? If only anyone could have predicted such a casualty of tech!! ... Morons.

Edit. Autocorrect. And, no, the irony is not lost on me lol

Slop fast and break things even faster!

Dear tech industry....

Stop trying to make fetch AI happen.

MAYBE deal with your obsession with laying off everyone every chance your get.

"But the AI assured me the code would work just fine!"

The hashtags on my Lemmy app are rendered with markdown so it's just a big ass fat header larger than the actual content. The audacity that this app can be paid for.

Sync, btw

Gee wiz, almost as if hiring humans was the right choice all along.

I've seen a lot of comparisons likening LLM code generation to how compilers and high level languages eventually removed the need for programmers to understand machine code. Arguments about determinism and code quality aside, I still think it's a false equivalence. Even if LLMs produced beautiful, ideal code, they fundamentally remove a programmer's understanding of what exactly is present in the logic. Mishaps are inevitable.

To prevent them, experienced programmers will do what it takes to produce human understanding and quality in spite of code generation. Yes, read the generated code. Yes, do code reviews with trusted peers. Yes, write/generate unit tests. There are even novel ideas about having LLMs interview us to make sure we understand the generated code's purpose. That's not the same as compilers, and it's not the story AI companies have told us.

Just like in the beginning: Programming languages are made for programmers, not for machines. It's on us to understand.

I love this for them.

Amazon has been one of the slowest and memory hungriest websites that I know of. And that is using it with an ad-blocker.

So that's where my phone case went

Obligatory ufck Amazon.

Just checked it out the site was significantly better back then.

Amazon is garbage and people who use it idiots