In the short term, this is not as dangerous as an outright ban on estrogen. If implemented and then combined with other methods of suppressing trans people, it might be far more destructive in the long term.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
10 comments in c/lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone view that post
[–] 28 points 8 months ago (1 child)

Sounds like a Republican accidentally had sex with a trans woman and is afraid all his friends will think he is gay.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    God damn I don't think I can take any more bad news today

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    YOU CAN LEAVE A COMMENT OPPOSING THIS ON THE FDA WEBSITE HERE : (https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FDA-2025-P-7321-0001)

    Currently most of the comments on there are from the groups proposing this. We can outnumber them.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not LGBTQ+ but have multiple friends who are.

    I"m just here to point out that if you are, you should look into getting armed and trained. It's a whole hell of a lot harder to oppress a group of people who are heavily armed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    Cracks open a 1930s history book

    Uh oh…

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/transgender@lemmy.blahaj.zone view that post
    [–] 25 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Ah, a government registry for peaceful, law-abiding citizens that are part of a vulnerable, scapegoat minority.

    Nothing problematic has ever come from that, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment