Publishers, including Penguin Random House, Elsevier, and HarperCollins, filed a new lawsuit against the shadow library Anna’s Archive.

Case file: https://torrentfreak.com/images/cengage-anna.pdf
Case file: https://torrentfreak.com/images/cengage-anna-exh.pdf

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 8 months ago

But are they suing Anthropic, OpenAI, Microsoft, and Google?

  • source
  • 20 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 117 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    Cool. Now that the Tech companies have pilfered it they're going to shut it down. There are a ton of books on there that aren't even worth money anymore. They're out of print or 1-2 editions behind the scholarly current.

    This is just bullshit

    I got access to a bunch of pay-walled scholarly papers on Anna's

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 81 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Elsevier? The company that makes money from public funded research? The one that does basically nothing and earns tons of money on the back of tax payers and free labor of authors, reviewers and editors.

    Hopefully open access policies will bring an end to the exploitative business model of science "publisher".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    That can only happen if we stop giving a shit about impact factors (and remove it from legal hiring requierements in some countries) and when big name PIs stop giving excuses like 'I want my research to be read' as if that wouldn't happen in the journals that are more appropriate for the topic they publish in.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 8 months ago

    So when Facebook wins their case that basically says "it's only copyright theft when ordinary people do it", Anna's Archive gets a pass, right? I'm assuming Facebook stole some of their training data from there, so fruit of the poisoned tree and all that jazz.

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Maybe they should try suing the businesses that actually have tons of venture capital money to take.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 67 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Why aren't they suing AI then?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago

    obtain an injunction that can apply further pressure on domain registrars and registries.

    Fuck the DNS.

    We can just have a public page that has their IP address and connect directly using that.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago

    Well, what now??

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago
    1. Go to Anna's Archive Wikipedia page
    2. Look at one of the 3 different urls published
  • source
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago

    If they have money to sue, they must not be hurting too badly from piracy.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    RIP to a real one. I read a lot of books because of Anna's.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    You do realize that they don't actually know who runs the website, right? This is a lawsuit against a bunch of John Does. Nothing has changed, AA still exists, and likely will exist long after those lawyers doing the suing retire.

    :neofox_glasses: 1
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago

    But it’s fair use: I’m using it to train my AI (actual intelligence)

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    Couldn't they just go to Tor like zlib did?

  • source
  • 15 comments in c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 118 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Anna should claim they're training an LLM.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 53 points 8 months ago* (6 children)

    Probably a good time to mention Anna's is looking for people with extra hard drive space to help seed their torrent files, and are constantly looking for volunteers and donations to help out. If you even only have a little time or resources, any help is much appreciated to keep the archives collection alive. You can also find links to them their wikipedia page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna%27s_Archive

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Extra hard drive space is good and all but the last time I looked at their lists, all decently sized torrents had a good enough amount of peers while the large torrents which aren't as manageable were the issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I just looked and thres lots of accessory torrents with 'small' archives (dozens of GB, not hundreds or heaven forbid TB)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    AA has managed to stay up for surprisingly long. I hope they will continue to do so. There is a large amount of documents that are hard to find anywhere else there, not to mention all the university books that would cost a a fortune to buy for a poor student...

    EDIT: typo.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I've gotten so much good stuff off there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    What are you guys getting from there? What kind of books/materials? Not to judge or spy on you (what a spy would say), but just genuinely curious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Some very niche books, like books that are related to a game series for example. Also some university literature, scientific papers and history/culture books that are either hard to find or very expensive locally.

  • source
  • parent