all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 37 points 8 months ago (2 children)

When you blunder your queen and check yourself in the same move and then offer a draw

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    It took months since Trump was back to remodling the White House for Trump to call China. That call happened right after China hit the off button on rare earth metals. The ones we need to keep modern society as we know it functional.

    Something to keep in mind when Trump starts talking about unlimited weapon stockpiles which need China in order to be made.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    And US needing China's material is only true because the US is at late stage capitalism where we rely on the cheapest country labor for imports.

    We're the 2nd largest producer, and have new projects underway to surpass China... But we have to actually spend the money and time to do so, and most companies would rather not pay US wages.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 8 months ago

    Why would China share with the US? Especially now given the US decline

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago*

    Wang said China will “never seek hegemony or expansion,” and that it wants to build “an equal and orderly multipolar world.”

    Seems to me EU is more aligned with China than USA in this.
    USA is a quickly failing world power, and the Iran war has just made it worse. After it was already bad from Trump undermining US economy, NATO, and relations with ALL their allies, except the fascist war criminals in Israel.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Cold war never ended

    Soviets just passed the beacon to China

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    China is mostly focused on economic growth, which they don't need to go to cold war over. Their political ambitions are mostly focused on the nearby regions.

    For the US leaders, however, it's a matter of global political dominance, which they are losing.

    To be more precise, both China and the US pursue economic dominance, but they do so through different means. China makes high-risk, high-reward investments, and the US militarily forces the countries under their influence. So, it's only a "war" for the US, while China is totally fine with multipolar world.

    It was somewhat different with USSR, where it was indeed political on both ends.

  • source
  • parent