all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 42 points 8 months ago (1 child)

though the company insists the downtime was ultimately due to human error.

I suppose using hat on top of a hat technology “agentic” “AI” in the first place is technically a human error.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 8 months ago

    Best headline 2026 so far lmfao

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    They just need to vibe harder.

    Luckily, that's exactly their plan.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    Their reasoning that it's a human error is, because the user gave the AI too much permissions. So does this mean this is ultimately the fault of the ceo? Because a manager gave some employee the permission to do such a thing. And another manager that manager, etc.. So by this reasoning everything is always the ceo's fault. Let's fire him!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Evidence that vibe coding makes even AWS go to shit.

    And of course their answer is to plan to vibe coder better, in the future. 🤖💩

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    To be fair, if I was tasked with improving Cost Explorer my first step would also be to delete the existing product

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Vibed too close to the sun.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)