top 59 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 38 points 9 months ago (5 children)

The tip your landlord sign has to be satirical right? ...right?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    For my own sanity I’m going to believe it is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] [S] 23 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago

    March for Billionaires @marchforbillionaires.org · 9h About two dozen people joined the march. Plus some obvious trolls with colored signs who counterprotested. February 8, 2026 at 9:32 AM

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Man, not even enough marchers for me to post the Arrested Development photo of Tobias Funke proclaiming, "There are dozens of us! Dozens!"

    Thank god

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    "There are dozens of us! Dozens (fractional)!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 9 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    “California is, I believe, the only state to give health insurance to people who come into the country illegally,” Kauffman said nervously. “I think we probably should not be providing that.”

    “So you’d rather everyone just be sick, and get everyone else sick?” another reporter asked.

    “That’s not what I’m saying,” said Kauffman.

    “Isn’t that effectively what happens?” the reporter countered. “They don’t have access to health care and they just have to get sick, right?”

    Kauffman contemplated that one for a moment. “Then they have to just get sick,” he said. “I mean, it’s unfortunate, but I think that it’s sort of impossible to have both liberal immigration laws and generous government benefits.”

    Do I need to comment on this one?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

    one thing that's so funny to me about this is that of course you're not supposed to say "we're going to brutalize poor people so billionaires don't have to pay more tax." you're supposed to say a rising tide lifts all boats, that kind of thing, and in fact there's a pic in the article where he's holding a sign about how a bigger pie means bigger slices or something to that effect. but as soon as he opens his mouth he just throws "we're going to take the healthcare" out there, because he has no self awareness, no critical thinking, no understanding of what in fact he is trying to do

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    This passage from the above-linked lw post from the "stone age billionaire" guy about how counter-protestors tried to prevent them from speaking is really telling:

    Then my friend Ben realized that this is a giant game of “I’m not touching you” for adults. Which is the stupidest dang thing IMO, but is pretty symetrical. A few of us just stood close together in a line, and we moved the speeches to the other side of that line. The counter-protestors would have to walk through us to block that speech, and we just didn’t move. When they tried to go around us we shifted to be in front of them. And they couldn’t actually touch us because that was against the rules, so this worked?

    I thought we all understood at this point that baiting your enemies into violence was one of the operating principles behind a lot of protests like this. Maybe not as a primary goal (unless you're the Westboro Bastard Church trying to get ammunition for lawsuits against the host city for failing to adequately protect you from the consequences of your own actions) but historically speaking violent repression isn't exactly a failure state for these events. One of the biggest victories for civil disobedience was putting the violent absurdity of segregation on full display by getting massive crackdowns on them for sitting in a restaurant, for example. Making the implicit violence of injustice explicit changes the emotional valence and makes it harder for John Q Public to justify actively supporting it. If you don't have enough mass support to implicitly threaten to do something (i.e. look at all these people who will cause problems if not recognized) then arguably being repressed is an even more significant goal because showing that "about two-dozen kooks believe something" isn't exactly going to mobilize social change on its own and it's not like billionaires care about solidarity with the hoi polloi.

    But considering the absolute bafflement on display about counterprotests being willing to rudely inconvenience them it really feels like they understood that sometimes people who believe things will do this thing called a "protest" where they get together and chant slogans and wave signs and have a grand old time, but had no coherent idea of why and never really thought to ask.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago*

    The problem for them is that the cops are actually the army of the rich and state and national government is controlled by billionaire lickers. They could go to DSA meetings and picket, but at best they could get a DSA member to be rude to them and then complain about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    30 rationalists gathered outside and nobody told them to touch grass

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 9 months ago
    [–] 16 points 9 months ago

    Only property. Water, however, isn’t a human right. Right Nestle?

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago

    bootlicking billionaires when they're the main ones supporting the thing you say is an existential threat is definitely a choice. rationalists seem to be getting more and more mask off in the face of the trump administration

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago

    "billionaires build prosperity" even has the causal arrow wrong. Bezos didn't start amazon as a billionaire for example.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    been mulling about these fuckers over the weekend and it’s absolutely wild how far they are wilful participants. self-identified chosen fuckwits, even if a number of them are (or at least, start out as) weaponised useful idiots

    incredibly frustrating

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I think their brains have just been thoroughly microwaved by social media feedback loops. I remarked elsewhere that I'm not sure these people are or can be earnest about this (cf. the fact that the billionaires they're celebrating are laser-focused on the tech they claim might doom the world); they're simply too conditioned towards creating outrage content for Twitter. To me, this is more akin to LARPing "Leave Britney alone!" than it is serious political activism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    To me, this is more akin to LARPing “Leave Britney alone!” than it is serious political activism.

    I will be 0% surprised to learn that aella et co got paid 5+ figures for this shit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I mean I'd like to think that if someone was going to pull the paid protestor bit that they wouldn't fail quite so embarrassingly, but then I think about our current crop of people in power and how fucking cooked they are and they can absolutely see them thinking "what does a mass protest cost, like $500?"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    To me, this is more akin to LARPing "Leave Britney alone!" than it is serious political activism.

    I wouldn't be too sure about that. Don't forget that monarchists are still a thing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Do you reckon it was a net negaive for them? It's heartening (to me) that it was such a damp squib, and it's always entertaining to witness the civillians' reaction to their first taste of TPOT.

    Seeing these dingdongs in the sunlight helps observers get over the "It cant be that stupid" barrier, in my experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Oh the reference is to that Aella. With the gnomes and LSD.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    Aella's dumb fucking sign pisses me off. No shit the 1% pay lots of taxes, they have a lot of money!

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (14 children)
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago

    "It’s horrifying to see normal people you dance with turn into nazis so easily."

    ..you're calling the people who hate the billionaires nazis? have you seen what the average billionaire has gotten up to recently???

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    strong echoes of the (probably fictional) reddit tale of the anarcho-capitalist who gets beaten up by real anarchists in Greece.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarcho_Capitalism/comments/3ucp8y/i_was_beat_up_by_left_anarchists_in_greece/

    I remember yelling "you're breaking the NAP" and things like that. "Stop initiating force against me."

    Beats Yud's fan fiction any day of the week.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    i actually spoke to someone in greece who tried tracking this story to its roots, and is pretty sure it didn't actually happen, but identified places it could have happened, so it seems to have been written by someone who'd been to exarcheia

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    I mean the vibe is pretty spot on, I'll give them that, and the premise of someone making fashy noises in an anarchist squat and getting summarily thrown out on his ass is perfectly believable, but the protagonist seems like an obvious a parody character and I think his belief that everyone he meets should adhere to the NAP is meant as a running gag.

    Also, I'd take issue with the unspoken premise that this would be an Exarcheia thing, getting your ass beat by anarchists who clocked you as a fascist (and vice versa) is a panhellenic phenomenon. Fascist here meaning less someone who likes Tucker Carlson and toothbrush mustaches, and more someone who is an organized member of a heavily nationalist sportball fan club and/or whatever is currently filling the void that Golden Dawn left but isn't making the news.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    I don’t blame people for not understanding the complexities of a global economy that makes it possible to buy a nearly-magic artifact that no human alive can create on their own for just 16 cents.[1] It feels like there is a certain amount of Stuff in the world, and so if some people have a lot of Stuff that’s only possible because others have much less Stuff, and that’s unfair. If life is hard, it’s the fault of the people who took all the Stuff.

    What a cunt.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago

    Her shirt describes her perception of reality

  • source
  • Lol protest in Pac Heights.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)