22
The Amount of New Solar Power Production Capacity China Is Manufacturing Is Legitimately Mind-Blowing (futurism.com)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/technology@piefed.social
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 0 points 9 months ago (5 children)

The amount of times I've had to block a cm0002 account is legitimately mind-blowing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    There are at least 40-50.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 0 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    Lmao, exaggerate much my serial downvoting troll friend :P

    There's only like 30 and I don't actively post from most of them anymore

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    30

    I don't need to say any more. I'll continue to downvote a personal botnet.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 0 points 9 months ago

    Except, none of it is automated so it can't be a "botnet" lmfao

    If you'd actually spent time researching something before you take a position on someone instead of just going along with what someone else said or vibes or whatever you'd be able to see real quick from my posting times my general life schedule lmao

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • 3 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    How does this affect those nuclear deals where the price has been guaranteed for many years? We have a couple in UK. One of which isn’t even open yet. The price per KWh was set before it was built.

    It would be deliciously ironic if solar ended up subsidising mothballed nuclear plants.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Nuclear costs are borne by the taxpayer anyway, either through utility fees or taxes. It's a waste of money at this juncture.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Well yes, so the taxpayer will subsidise everyone’s electric bill to pay the extortionate rate that was agreed upon.

    The way China is going it could soon be so cheap that people will only pay a standing charge, and the electricity could actually be free. Like they promised with nuclear in the 60s.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • 3 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    "Dragging energy costs down around the globe" - such a shame the end consumer in a UK household doesn't see that reduction of costs in their bills.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • load more comments (1 reply)