Finally ditched my ISP’s router and installed my own opnsense firewall with my own Access Point. I have crowdsec running on opnsense to block attacks + adguard to block ads and malicious domains. My network is segmented between my homelab that is exposed and my AP.

Finally feels quite safe in my network 😅

all 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [B] 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
AP WiFi Access Point
DNS Domain Name Service/System
IP Internet Protocol
IoT Internet of Things for device controllers

4 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 14 acronyms.

[Thread #47 for this comm, first seen 31st Jan 2026, 16:30] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Networking isn't my strong suit, so this might be a stupid question. But what exactly is a hardware firewall? Is it the same thing as my Internet facing router blocking incoming packets which haven't been requested from "inside the home" network?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 9 months ago

    A hardware firewall generally indicates a standalone appliance that is dedicated to being a firewall. Not to be confused with a software firewall as you would see with UFW, or Windows Defender. Modern routers do possess some of the same tenets of a hardware firewall, but a dedicated hardware firewall usually gives a broader range of defenses such as IDS/IPS, filtering, etc.

    I have a dedicated hardware firewall in the form of pFsense. The 'black box' in OP's picture is the hardware firewall.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Good for you. I use OpenWrt on a decent router yet it's so flexible. I can create multiple VLANs with different firewall rules, multiple APs, Ad and IP blocking etc.

    Honestly I can't imagine going back to a shitty ISP router ever.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Even the wrong non-isp routers are ridiculous compared to OpenWrt capable ones. You're telling me I'm paying a huge premium to get a cutting edge Nighthawk, and then they shove a subscription service in my face to use any of these features? Let alone the security implications of having all your traffic routed through proprietary software. No thank you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    I always get my isp outers as pass through so network is controlled by my entry. I have never bothered doing much with it but it's nice to have the option.

    I used to use a ddwrt firmware for years but eventually my hardware could never keep up with my net speeds and manufacture firmware was faster. Trying an Omada network now seems alright but haven't added their wifi.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    OP, you may want to look into ntopng. I think opnsense has a ntopng plugin. I find it very useful for traffic analysis.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I bought a topton router with Intel N150. I was and still am disappointed with how much it heats up. Enev at idle it's not really comfortable to touch it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I don't think thermal paste is the problem here, the whole box is god damn hot, so it conducts heat well. At wall it measures 14-15w consumption, got it there from like 20-22w that was on defaults. Given that N150 is 6W TDP, the whole system just runs hot.

    A fan would help, but I wanted fanless for a reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    TDP is a very misunderstood concept these days because it used to be a hard upper limit but now it's god knows what. The Spec Sheet is calling it "Processor Base Power". What might that be you ask? Well of course it is

    The time-averaged power dissipation that the processor is validated to not exceed during manufacturing while executing an Intel-specified high complexity workload at Base Frequency and at the junction temperature as specified in the Datasheet for the SKU segment and configuration.

    In other words it's just marketing mumbo jumbo. According to other users the N150 can draw as much as 20 up to 35 watts even. The fact that the heat is radiating well through your case sounds like a positive if anything. This is x86 we're talking about. The added complexity of that architecture over ARM comes at a price.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    It wouldn't be a bad idea. Right at this moment my temps are as such:

    • dev.cpu.0.temperature: 103 °F
    • dev.cpu.1.temperature: 103 °F
    • dev.cpu.2.temperature: 105 °F
    • dev.cpu.3.temperature: 109 °F
    • hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 81 °F

    IIRC, the case temp is like 194 freedom units. I've never really seen it get much higher than it is now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    That looks exactly like the box I grabbed. Are you running your opnsense on the bare metal, or are you virtualizing it? My only regret for mine was not picking up more ram.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I’m running on bare metal. I have a physical homelab behind. Can’t you add ram?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I could, if it wasn’t so damn expensive for 32gb

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I can't imagine why you need 32gb for opnsense. I can run it on a single core and 1gb, unless I literally want every DNS blacklist loaded in which case 4gb

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    I’m running a proxmox instance on mine, with opnsense in a vm and plex, Jellyfin pihole and my omada controller on lxc. 16gb is just enough for everything, but I like to future proof and buffer things, so it makes me a bit nervous utilizing 12 of that 16 gb and only leaving 4gb for proxmox.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Personal preference, it’s what I’ve been using since I started my homelab and I think it works well enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    What do you think of Keenetic? Security-wise, do you trust it?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Nice.

    Running different SSIDs too?

    I put all my IoT stuff on a dedicated 2.4-only network, VLANd it to the (pfsense) firewall which allows the VLAN trunk to be split into separate logical NICs that I apply different policies to, like no access to the internet, etc...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I have crowdsec running on opnsense to block attacks

    Crowdsec is a pretty good package. It does blocking, but is geared more to being an IDS. Opnsense supports Suricata which is a more aggressive, and all encompassing IDS/IPS. I don't think opnsense supports it's cousin Snort.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Share some pictures and stats of you could. Do u see many probes?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments