The White House used a photo that was digitally altered with Google AI tools in its PR campaign against resistance to the federal agents’ assault on Minnesota, according to a Google detection system that confirms whether the tech giant’s AI tools were used to alter a photo.

In the original photo, local civil rights activist Nekima Levy Armstrong was shown being escorted by authorities after her arrest in connection to a protest against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at Cities Church in Saint Paul, Minnesota.

The version published by the White House’s official X account showed an image that had been altered to make it appear as if Levy Armstrong were openly weeping.

did the White House digitally alter this image of Nekima Levy to make her cry??? bizarre, dark stuff… https://t.co/COHjc4jQjZ pic.twitter.com/w2Sjv14za1

— Peter Twinklage (@PeterTwinklage) January 22, 2026

“I was there when they arrested her, and she definitely wasn’t crying — she was calm, rational, and dignified,” said Jordan Kushner, an attorney for Levy Armstrong. “This is part and parcel of a fascist regime where they literally invent reality to serve their fascist agenda.”

According to an Intercept analysis using Google SynthID — a program that identifies hidden markers used by Google AI tools on photos — the photo had been altered with the tech giant’s generative AI tools. (Google declined to comment.)

[

Related

Trump’s War on America](https://theintercept.com/2026/01/16/trump-abolish-ice-renee-good-jonathan-ross/)

In response to questions about the altered photo, a spokesperson for the White House referred The Intercept to a tweet from White House spokesperson Kaelan Dorr lashing out at “the people who feel the need to reflexively defend perpetrators of heinous crimes in our country.”

“Enforcement of the law will continue,” wrote Dorr. “The memes will continue.”

The original, unaltered image showing Levy Armstrong looking stalwart first appeared on the web in a pair of tweets by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, according to several image search engine tools.

About a half hour later, the White House posted its altered image showing Levy Armstrong in tears — including text labeling her as a “far-left agitator” and accusing her of “orchestrating church riots.”

The White House X account appears to have been the first place the altered image appeared on the web, according to the image search tools.

[

Related

Reproductive Rights Activists Charged Under Law Intended to Protect Abortion Clinics](https://theintercept.com/2023/02/03/abortion-clinics-face-act/)

Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Levy Armstrong’s arrest on Thursday. Along with Chauntyll Louisa Allen and William Kelly, Levy Armstrong faces charges under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, a 1994 law designed to limit anti-abortion protesters from impeding patients from seeking care.

The arrests followed days of outrage online from the right over a protest on Sunday in which anti-ICE demonstrators entered the Cities Church, where a local ICE official serves as a pastor, according to The Associated Press.

“Religious freedom is the bedrock of this country,” Bondi wrote on X Thursday. “We will protect our pastors. We will protect our churches. We will protect Americans of faith.”

Jeffrey Lichtman, a defense attorney with numerous high-profile federal cases under his belt, told The Intercept that the post could conceivably have a prejudicial effect as the case against her proceeds.

“This altered photo makes her look weak and scared, and some people may interpret that as guilt,” Lichtman said. “I’d try to use it as evidence that this was a political prosecution. This isn’t, like, some aide that works in a congressional office somewhere, this is the White House, and it’s clear the White House controls Pam Bondi, and she’s the one responsible for this arrest.”

Ron Kuby, a veteran civil rights lawyer, told The Intercept that the problem lay less in the meme than in the prosecution itself.

“As a defense lawyer, I’d work hard to make sure it wasn’t repeated, but it’s not going to result in dismissal of charges or any meaningful sanction from a judge,” Kuby said. “This is just Thursday in America. The outrage is not the graphic — the outrage is that they turned a simple disorderly conduct case into a federal prosecution for their propaganda efforts.”

Update: January 22, 2026, 5:27 p.m. ETThis story has been updated to reflect that Google declined to comment.

The post White House Doctored Photo With Google AI to Make It Look Like an Activist Was Sobbing During Perp Walk appeared first on The Intercept.


From The Intercept via this RSS feed

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 9 months ago

Shouldn't they be using MechaHitler? I mean Grok?

  • source
  • 20 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 60 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I wish I could say that I'm surprised, but... We're talking about the "president" that posted an AI generated video of him flying a fighter jet dumping shit on protestors.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 9 months ago

    So cringy. Weirdos. Who does that?

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    It would be super unfortunate if every AI center on the planet burned down overnight

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Pretty strong argument that that's an eighth Amendment violation actually.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    fuck the only slight giveaway is the color of her lips

    i really really don't like this generation of AI

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    They're embedded with watermarks to identify AI alternation tough, for eg Google can easily detect if Gemini was used in this case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    But there is no guarantee that every image generating LLM will always keep watermarks. The technology and model basics are out there in the wild. Someone can and will custom train a new one to create political deepfakes that does not generate intentional watermarks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    Pathetic losers.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I hate hate hate Google, but I don't want to get a new email, host my own photos, and cloud server. Hell, I don't even know how nor have the time to learn, but if I had an alternative I would switch.

    Fuck Google.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago*

    Clear your login data and cookies on all your devices. As you use your device with different logins just force yourself to do "change email" after each one as you use them. It will be annoying for like the first day. You'll randomly remember "oh yeah, I still have Gmail for my electric bill that's on auto pay". It's fine. It doesn't need to happen in one day.

    Porting Drive and Photos is more annoying and time consuming. But that's just a night with a beer or two and a guide you can find online. All of which will offer alternatives. Just be sure you're not going from one awful company to another when you choose one. Self hosting is great but it's not for everyone.

    It's not as bad as you think it is. You probably overestimate the number of accounts you actually use regularly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago*

    There are email alternatives, you don't need to "host" your own servers or anything a physical backup works just as well. The only place that is difficult would the app store if you have an android. Some apps just require a play account to function

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Reminds me of learned helplessness. Is switching email a one day and youre done type of thing. No. But pretty fast, you can get quite far, and the rest comes along as you go. If you want convenience, tey proton mail. They even have a smart switch feature. It's its own ecosystem, the difference is you acually pay the company, instead of letting them scrape and harvest all your data to sell

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    BTW I didn't generate these, I've been holding on to them for a few years.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments