all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 10 months ago (1 child)

Another 'anarchist' who has no idea what it means.
I'm certain their definitions of 'socialist', 'communist', 'libertarian', and 'leftist' are just as comical.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago

    Trump can't really invade Iran without admitting the demonstrations in the US have a point. Although I can see MAGAts coming up with far fetched explanations of why this is different.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    Ah yes, anarchism. Arguing for replacing a partially democratic theocracy with a batshit insane fascist monarchy, for the purpose of letting the US privatize the oil fields. This is some Dali levels of insanity (but with none of the talent)

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Is that what Russian bots call themselves now?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    As an actural Anarchist what the hell is this person saying?

    Quite frankly I think theres at least a non insignificant chance that the protest was started/funded/pushed partially/entirely by the zionists/US-imperialists or was at the absolute bare minimum cooped by said zionists/us-imperialists. Theres a chance this is 100% organic but seeing how common Zionist flags are at these "Iranian" protests I get the feeling its less than 100%.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments