all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They started great with unpronounceable name, webpage with zero actual details and goals that sound extra strange considering what gnome is. Good job.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Yeah I can't see any way to pronounce that name other than "jism", which is certainly an unusual association to suggest for one's own project.

    The project doesn't seem like it's actually a joke, but that's quite an unfortunate name choice if they are trying to be taken seriously by anyone who speaks English.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Is this person at all known? They have next to 0 presence on their Github page. It's unclear whether they have any developer experience, which makes me wonder if this document was just AI generated without any knowledge of what it would take to do what they want to do.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    Without looking into it at all, there are plenty of possible valid reasons why someone would choose to pick a fresh pseudonym for a project like this. I think it's important that we don't lose that, socially.

    Give it time and let them prove themselves if this is relevant to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I agree that being able to work under pseudonyms is good.

    Still, that doesn't mean this project worthy of media attention given. It would be if there was at least some implementation work done. In general, projects tend to actually do something before making an announcement, especially one with an ambitious goal like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    It seems... pretty bare. I've looked at the page, and for a "design-led downstream", we don't have much for their own design philosophy except that it'll have minimalism like GNOME, and the presentations seems to be very "vague".

    I'm a bit skeptical about this project tbh.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/linux@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Well right off the bat they’ve failed at designing their project’s name

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago