all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 10 months ago* (9 children)

Faith without works is dead. Not saying China needs to start sinking ships, but unless they do something beyond strongly worded letters, it is, actually, “accepting” what the US is doing.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 14 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    I'd really like to see China put sanctions on the US over this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    Can they do it? Without control of the reserve currency?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    I don't see what the reserve currency has to do with this. China effectively has a monopoly on production of many essential goods that the US needs. They can just choose to stop exporting them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    What is with the obsession over the reserve currency lately? I had a lib friend randomly spouting off about how China could never hold the reserve currency for... reasons? In response to me saying I might need to learn mandarin to flee eventually as well (I'm joking, I know I could probably never make it happen).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    I don't really get it either, seems like another bit of mythology about American greatness people memorized and are now regurgitating uncritically.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    Which is, of course, quite silly. I'm guessing that a counter-hegemonic financial system has already been developed and is very much an active part of the strategy of surviving as a socialist project while global capitalism exists. I just haven't tried to understand that fully yet. I appreciate any insight you or anyone else might have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, the pivotal point was Russia getting kicked out of SWIFT. That forced a creation of an alternate financial system out of necessity, and over past three years it's expanded significantly within BRICS. The reality is that you don't need to have a reserve currency, you can just do direct currency swaps. But more importantly, China is basically the world's factory, and has a massive trade surplus with the rest of the world. Which means holding yuan is useful for other countries, since they can always exchange it for something tangible they need.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    im glad china is taking such decisive actions

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    If they don't sink naval fleet off the coast, then it is either acceptable, or they've received some other unrelated acceptable concessions for not sinking the fleet.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    You think escalating against Trump is a good idea?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Sinking a navy is not an escalation for an illegal invasion. You can order the US to leave before doing it. Unacceptable has a meaning other than threatening to complain longer. Sinking a fleet is more appropriate and less of an escalation than blockading Taiwan from US trade.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -9 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    273 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    4 comments in c/geopol@sopuli.xyz view that post