no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
8 comments in c/EuropeanUnion@europe.pub view that post
[–] 2 points 10 months ago

If they hate privacy, why can't we have a look at their email accounts?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    Social media have a very difficult problem to solve: the lack of consequences (due, in part, to anonymity) makes them a cesspool where people can be the absolute worse and rarely face any punishment for it.

    They also have a bot problem that's also hard to solve.

    We need to fight these issues and, while identifying the uses definitely helps, the loss of privacy is too big for it to be a good trade-off.

    The solution is much simpler: start making these companies responsible of what happens in their grounds as soon as they grow under a certain threshold.

    If your social network has more than, say, 1 million users, you are big enough to be held accountable for what happens there.

    This way, you force the big ones to start worrying about what happens in their grounds while also leaving small communities (that usually lack the means to moderate 24/7 their places) untouched in the same way they are now.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The problem with that is: https://www.techdirt.com/2019/11/20/masnicks-impossibility-theorem-content-moderation-scale-is-impossible-to-do-well/

    My own idea, don't make it depend on platform size.

    Make it depend on the existence of recommendation algorithms: anything recommended by an algorithm counts as speech by the platform.

    If that were the law, any forum or wiki no matter who operates it isn't liable, but Facebook or TikTok would need to quickly turn off all options except "show me chronologically what the accounts I explicitly followed posted" (of course "most liked in the last 12 hours" or similar would also still be ok, but "this too might interest you based on your previous activity" wouldn't). That would also turn them into actually useful communication systems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    i think there are privacy preserving ways of validating users as real humans but i doubt that will be the mechanism proposed

    the mechanism to counter disinformation is equally tricky but we should definitely start trying

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Not sure how I'd will help with my dad and brother inlaw doom scrolling Facebook looking up and saying. Did you hear about

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/ireland@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Fuck sake. :/

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago*

    This guy is a dim witted product of circumstance. He is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, and wait until you get a load of his 'right hand' woman. Helen McEntee. Both of them can only read from pre written cards.

    When questioned on the fly, without any schooling they are both deer in headlights.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago*

    Funny how they don’t want to actually regulate the toxic algorithms then.

    Please sign the petition to stop this nonsense https://bsky.app/profile/amckinstry.bsky.social/post/3mb6yzkjmas2u

    And never let Simon Harris forget being called out for deliberately smearing a vulnerable minority to chase votes from the fash https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/2025/11/04/fintan-otoole-simon-harris-is-deliberately-spreading-disinformation-on-immigration/

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Are there people (people, not governmental clans representatives) who actually support this bullshit?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 5 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 30 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago

    Interesting that this happens in Ireland, which is known for capitulating to big tech (because they're a tax haven). Almost like this is not actually about restricting the ability of big tech to cause damage.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    “Ireland to lead EU drive to kill social media.”

    FTFY.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 3 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 13 points 10 months ago

    "to block anonymous ‘keyboard warriors’ from spreading hate and disinformation online."

    More like to prevent alternative points of view from being expressed.

    Who decides what is disinformation? When will the tabloids be forced to stop spreading hate and disinformation?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    What a terrible idea

  • source