Besides the two I ate, two are missing in the middle.

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 31 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Damn that’s egregious. Why not at least space them out evenly?! I guess by feeling the ends only, you assume they’re tightly packed in there?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    They probably have a commercial photo with the tray partly pulled out showing just the first two and had to have packaging that reflected that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Maybe that plastic package costs less to make with only two spacers rather than between each set

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    It’s just vacuum-pressed plastic over a mould. I can’t imagine the mould’s price fluctuating depending on the shape. This seems like it’s specially designed to fool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I'd say designed to fool.

    Mold price can change with more detail since you have to cut away more material from the form this is vacuumed over, with smaller cutters or EDM work. But at this scale it would not be significant enough cost compared to production and ingredient costs. We would be talking an increase in mold price that would be negligable in the overall costing of the project.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Hah this post reminded me - I noticed this on stupid AfterEight mints as well, they didnt update the size of packaging (box maybe slightly but the little papers are the same), so you can clearly see how much they reduced those mints (circa 1/4 iirc).

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The kids Cliff bars have gotten smaller once again since I bought them last.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment