all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)

It's not that we have to, but that the one-percenters are far too selfish to allow it to happen any other way.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 10 months ago

    🤭 The CEO seems remarkably comfortable with causing problems at a global scale and then suggesting that humanity is resilient and that humanity will rise to the challenge of dealing with what he has done to humanity... Is this called, "a complete abdication of consideration, accountability and responsibility"? Is this something like, "Well sure I've destroyed something of yours, but you're resilient. You'll deal with it. It's not my problem or responsibility. All I did was destroy what was yours so that I could force mine on you, instead."?

  • source
  • parent
  • 110 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    7 comments in c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world view that post