all 53 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 36 points 10 months ago* (12 children)

Shocking.

The redactions are kind of proof, though.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    Any redaction has to have an explanation according to the act, people just need to submit foias for the reason for the redaction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    The reason is 'because secret'

    You wanna see what's in this shit? You gotta do it like the Kremlin papers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Maybe. But if they get 10 or 100k requests it isn't dying and if they claim secrecy they have to present their reasoning in as closed session to Congress.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    That's adorable. I love that for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Well that's a weird thing to say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    Or a forceful counter coup.

    ... just sayin'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Lol, you think the dems are any different?

    Nah. We're not getting their documentation of the truth until all the oligarchs and their pets get what they deserve.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    No, not in the ways that matter, they are not different.

    Hence the counter coup.

    I'm not talking about a Dem led counter coup, I find that extraordinarily unlikely.

    I'm talking about removing the treasonous, lying, thieving, evil bastards, by force.

    Doesn't really matter to me who or what actually constitutes that force.

    Because at that point, it will be clear to nearly everyone, that the entire rotten, demented structure is as arbitrary as it has, in actuality, always been.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago

    We all know why

    The entire world knows why

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    I see a red page and I want it painted black...

    No details anymore: I want them to turn black...

    I see the girls go by, dressed in their summer clothes.

    I have to █████ my █████, untill my ██████████ █████!

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (8 children)

    You turned it white, though.
    Not black:P

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (7 children)

    Ah. I defaulted to ascii blocks, which usually are black... well, at least they were, before the internet discovered the concept of dark mode.

    Kids these days and their newfangled emojis...

    Here, uh...

    I 👀 a 🟥 📄 and I want it [🪣-🖌️] ⬛.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (6 children)

    The fun part is that ⬛ is still lighter than the background (which is #000) for me.

    before the internet discovered the concept of dark mode

    "usually", because they would also be green, red, orange, purple, pink and a whole lot of other colours, before the web became all classy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    before the web became all classy.

    You have a weird way of saying 'boring, sterile, and corporate.'

    =P

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    Except that I kinda prefer a simpler website than the multicolour messes that I see from those times.
    I am guessing it would have started with people using it normally in a few areas, for emphasis and then ballooned up to the kind of mess similar to the kind of syntax highlighting this article was talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    There are ways to use subtle and subdued color palettes that are more interesting visually than typical modern style guides, don't break built in hyperlink color defaults, while also not being as... high contrast, high intensity, as many 90s sites.

    We have just had stylistic stagnation for a good deal of time now.

    EDIT: Some examples:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (2 children)

    That looks nice.

    I feel like a designer needs to first articulate the intent of the colour usage, before deciding on it.
    Because in some places, you want a higher contrast, while in others, you just want a separate colour, without stuff popping out too much. Then there is also the case of less contrasting colours popping out more, because they were used in a larger area than they were chosen for and same the other way round, when you choose a lower contrasting colour combination due to the both colour areas being large enough, like window background vs document background, but then if you end up using the combination for something like text, it becomes hard to read.

    So for instance, using the "Tower of Glass" example, one can use the last 2 colour for things like:

    • window background vs button/field background
    • button normal vs button hover
    • background vs alt background (though in this case, I would be looking for even lower contrasting colours

    ... but not for cases like:

    • background vs text
    • background vs border

    While you could still also use it for text vs alt-text.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    ... I completely agree, it seems you understand UI/UX design principles very well!

    So... yeah, its entirely possible to have a more varied and more artful internet, that is also not garrish, and broadly functional, if one takes care to account for details as you've outlined.

    That just... isn't the path we largely went down.

    But uh, neocities is a thing, they're trying to bring back the old spirit of much more lightweight, much more personal and customized websites that the old net had.

    https://neocities.org/

    Look at their example showcases!

    The sites themselves are art.

    EDIT:

    Though it might be a good idea if they attempted to also offer a basic formatting standard for mobile sites.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    it seems you understand UI/UX design principles very well

    Just one of those things that you just get, but haven't studied, so may not have the required words for.
    I mostly think in terms of usability, convenience and utility from my experience in using GUI software and websites, with no manifest-able artistic inclination.

    https://neocities.org/

    Looks kinda nice.
    There are still quite a few interesting websites I have seen even without it. They are just rare and require someone to put some amount of obsession into it. So either way, I won't expect normal companies to end up with art, even if the tech part of it has been made easier.
    I mean, I could develop a site like that without neocities, but I won't be designing one as such. And my site can already take care of a wide variety of page sizes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago (24 children)

    Doesn't matter if they showed explicit images of Trump penetrating children. No legal consequences would be done to him anyway. Anyone with the power to resist this administration has already had all the pretext they need to do so and they have not. So either no one has that power, or they're too gutless to use it. We are fucked.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    But quite obviously, MAGA has lost almost all of their power.

    That's a wild statement to make. Everything they set in motion is still going strong. Nothing has gotten better. People are still being abducted off the streets, women are still being persecuted for exercising their reproductive rights, prices are still skyrocketing, all of our allies and trade partners are still cutting us out. A bunch of his shortsighted dumbfuck supporters might be temporarily pissed off but by the time the next election rolls around they'll fall back in line. They're not going to stop hating immigrants, women, and trans people just because more evidence that their dickhead leader was a pedophile came out. We already knew that anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    There's the real possibility of fracturing once Trump either dies or somehow actually sees social consequences from his years of child sex trafficking. I'd say the death is more likely, and maybe it won't be far off.

    The two main factions of MAGA as I see it are the MTG types that are rabid fascist bigots opposed to pedophilia, and the institutional types that are rabid fascist bigoted pedophiles and pedophile supporters. It would be fun to see them destroy each other, sooner rather than later.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    When the law fails... what is left?

    Cowards?

    Or those with convinction?

    ... Have we all forgotten how this country was founded?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 10 months ago (15 children)

    So what are you gonna do about it?

    You. Not by begging some distant daddy. You.

    With your words with your hands with your friends with whatever tools you know how to use?

    What are you going to do?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (14 children)

    I guess I'll keep shit talking on the internet. I'm just one dude and not going to achieve anything by myself. I don't have any tools that would solve this issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago* (12 children)

    Okay. So how do you not be by yourself?

    How do you learn more tools?

    How do you be more than just one dude (cutting yourself in half doesn't work, idk where to get all alien virus)?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    It sounds like you have ideas. It would be way more productive for you to just share them outright, rather than this weird browbeating you're doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    Bunch of em! But I don't know you. I don't know who you are. I don't know what would appeal to you. I don't know what you're capable of.

    And I'm not going to dictate specific policy to you, because I would rather mismatch a little than have minions with no diversity of thought or pissy shitlibs arguing with me over minutae.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    Sounds like a great opportunity to make a post in one of the many political communities on Lemmy then, to create some real discussion. Rather than stringing us along in the comment section here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    Funny how what I have to say is political but what you have to say isn't. Also, the entire second half of what I said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    We're talking about actions we can take against our political leaders/political system, are we not? Is that somehow not political?

    IDK man, I'm just trying to steer you in a productive direction, because asking a bunch of leading questions in the comment section ain't it. If you don't want to talk about specifics, what are you even here for?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (6 children)

    There's so fucking much that needs to be done; a single person can't consider all of it, but read the second half of what I wrote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (5 children)

    Yeah I read what you wrote. I responded to it. I'll put it here again just in case you missed it.

    If you don't want to talk about specifics, what are you even here for?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    I would like people to think for themselves and don't want to be in charge or argue with shitlibs.

    Also, as pointed out, this is c/shitposts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    All the more reason to have your discussion somewhere else, in a place that isn't dedicated to shitposts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    They are not released yet.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Every reaction is the word Trump, keep it going.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago*

    Noncin' around the Christmas tree

    At the Epstein party hop

    Censored everywhere you can see

    Every pedo just can't stop.

    You will get a sentimental feeling

    When you hear

    Pedos singing "Don't be silly,

    Deck the halls with boughs of holly!"

    Noncin' around the Christmas tree

    Have a creepy holiday

    Pedos dancing creepily

    In the new old-fashioned way

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    president drumf doesn’t him and his besties exposed

  • source