We’re cooked.

all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 11 months ago

So how long untill digital photos are inadmissble in court?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    I mean of course it is. It got basically infinite training data

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    Seems like very thinly veiled advertising for a new version of google’s ai image generation.

    If AI is getting this good at imitating the things that signal a photo is real, then guys: We are cooked.

    “We are cooked, fellow kids!”

    The author also pretty much says “all other AI was slop before this, right guys?”

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Yeah, a more honest take would discuss the strengths & weakness of the model. Flux is still better at text than Nano Banana, for instance. There's no "one model to rule them all," as much as tech journalism seems to want to write like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago*

    Nano Banana Pro's built into Photoshop now, as is Flux Kontext pro.

  • source
  • [+] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    Most of these images have really shitty resolution as well. Can't they generate higher res stuff or would inconsistencies otherwise be more obvious?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Directly, generating higher res stuff requires way more compute. But there are plenty of AI upscalers out there, some better, some worse. These are also built into Photoshop now. The difference between an AI image that is easy to spot and hard to spot is using good models. The difference between an AI image that is hard to spot and nearly impossible to spot is another 20 min of work in post.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Nothing will feel real, and we will own nothing.

  • source