53
Don’t cite the Adversarial Poetry vs AI paper — it’s chatbot-made marketing ‘science’ (pivot-to-ai.com)
submitted 11 months ago by to c/techtakes@awful.systems
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Not even poetically sound

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnIDt3xATVw&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video
https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20251124-dont-cite-the-adversarial-poetry-vs-ai-paper-its-chatbot-made-science - podcast

time: 5 min 46 sec

all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 11 months ago (5 children)

AI preprints : peer review :: Scott Aaronson : cops

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    You'd think peer review would make things better here, but big ML conferences have to deal with an absurd amount of submissions these days. NeurIPS this year got over 21000. The system they use for reviews is that anyone who submits a paper is required to review a certain number of other papers. So yeah, your ML paper is getting reviewed by other people who happen to submit their own papers. Who are competing with you to get their own papers accepted. Yeah, no problems there.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 7 points 11 months ago 
    The power, of words:
Is all but naught, if not heard.
And a bot, cannot.
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    @dgerard, oh nice quote-repost recursion. 👍🏻

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    @dgerard I hate everything.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •