Holy shit I think someone at the CDC used an AI to do their report on a vaccine and didn't proof read it.

the CDC is a captured entity. they are completely compromised and should not be listened to. default to the WHO instead. there's no regulatory capture there.

Not at all surprising. Didn’t I just read about another CDC study that says using this preservative had no correlation to autism?

AI slop, probably. AI is good at inventing "sources" to bolster it's hallucinations.

The CDC is sadly not trustable anymore. No one should be taking their advice or their meetings. US will prob have to rebuild the whole agency from scratch someday in order to have it function again.

So AI fuckup?

That’s all well and good, but the people leading these organizations believe that science = jumping to a vibes based conclusion and then smashing a bunch of shit together calling it a process. It doesn’t matter if the sources are just made up or simply not there. Actual data driven results are for egghead gay communists who think chem trails are fake.

Just wait until that son-of-a-bridge RFK Jr. gets to it. I hear he has a fresh shipment of Sharpies from the White House to make sure it is totally accurate.

He will start by editing out the "not" in the above quote. See? Science works!

Breaking News from RFK Jr: 100% of people who have Autism and have this shot, had this shot! It was the shot!

But what does a panel of con artists, quacks, cranks and influencers say?

Definitely surprised that the incompetent administration allowed this.

US CDC report shows no link between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism

~RFK Jr

That's just going to make the nutjobs believe it more...

Tomorrow:

Oops typo
-RFK Jr

Again?

Too many people can’t grasp that autism symptoms show up around the age these vaccines are given, and that it often causes your child to regress to a degree. But no, they don’t want to accept a complicated answer that doesn’t let them blame somebody.

I don't think this headline belongs to this article.

The article is talking about how the study referenced a non-existent source

If the evidence doesn't support your cause: lie

I'm inclined to believe it, but the CDC has very little credibility right now

Interesting https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethylmercury