A system that expects parties to listen, compromise and find common ground produces calmer politics and better decisions.

Canada can have that too with proportional representation. We just have to choose it.

Graphic with a portrait of Sanna Marin, former Prime Minister of Finland, wearing a light gray turtleneck. Beside her is a quote about leading a five party coalition and valuing compromise, listening and consensus in Finland’s proportional representation system.

all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Right now there's not calm politics and better decisions because the capitalists didn't need to compromise and find common ground, they just built a coalition with their fascist friends. It's also a broken system

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Iceland under proportional representation with the highest percentage of unions says otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Iceland can't even save it's own language. They are a tiny tiny nation that can't be a model for influential nations that need a change in a sane direction

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Ah yes let’s ignore all their successes because no country is perfect.

    can't be a model for influential nations that need a change in a sane direction

    Because they should model their countries on widespread corruption and stupid wars instead. Are you kidding me?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago

    You could use better examples and make a better argument. Iceland is NOT a good example for your argument

    just because you don't like what you are being told, doesn't mean its wrong to point out. You don't get upset about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Proportional representation is great. In australia we use it for one house of parliament with preferential voting for the other. It allows a wider range of popular opinion to be reflected than even preferential.

    But both italy and israel have proportional representation, so let's not think that it magically turns you into a scandanavian social democracy.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 11 months ago

    both italy and israel have proportional representation

    Italy uses a parallel system and Israel has serious problems with their society.

    Iceland, Norway, Ireland and Austria use proportional representation and they’re very successful stable democracies.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    We've had minority governments before. We have one now.

    Usually it's when the best things happen for us.

    It's hard to use the successes of one system to promote another, though, as all of the good things we got from our minority government happened before prop rep.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Its all well and good until Winston Peters comes along. (Known as the king maker in NZ as he has gotten do decide the outcome of multiple elections)

    Definitely better than the two party system though.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    based supporter of developing countries who uses imperialist terminology to described them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)