GNOME's Nautilus file manager is finally matching the behavior of other file managers like KDE's Dolphin and Xfce's Thunar with a keyboard shortcut for copying and pasting files.

This Week in GNOME highlighted a notable albeit one could argue long overdue change for GNOME Files / Nautilus: Ctrl+Insert and Shift+Insert support for copying and pasting files.

all 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 25 points 11 months ago* (16 children)

i use CTRL C and CTRL V ... What am I missing here?

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Nothing if that works for you, but sometimes I end up using Ctrl+Insert / Shift+Insert a lot because I am doing a lot of things in the terminal and Ctrl+C has a different meaning there, so it is nice for Ctrl+Insert / Shift+Insert to work everywhere for when I have it in my muscle memory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (12 children)

    Essentially nothing. They copied the shortcuts from Thunar and Dolphin for copy paste.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (11 children)

    I’m a gnome guy but always swap to Thunar on a fresh install.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    It’s probably just that I got used to it with XFCE at some point. My main two concerns:

    • I love having the path in the navbar (and not have to Ctrl-L)
    • I don’t like having devices tucked behind “Other Locations” rather than in the sidebar

    Otherwise, I find Nautilus much more aesthetically pleasing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    I haven’t used Nautilus in ages, so I can’t say for certain, but Thunar is a more traditional-feeling file manager. It feels more like an older version of the Windows file manager but with tabs, while Nautilus seems more Mac-like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Can Thunar run under Wayland or nah? (Just curious, I don't want to actually use it.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Yes. In fact, almost every XFCE component can ran on Wayland now. At this point, they’re just a few bugs to hash out and figuring out what they’ll actually use for the compositor.

    https://wiki.xfce.org/releng/wayland_roadmap

    From what it sounds like, there will be a somewhat usable Wayland release in late 2026 alongside X11, and I imagine we’ll get a more polished release in late 2028.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

    Everything runs under Wayland. That should be your default expectation.

    At this point, Wayland is the preferred environment for GTK and Qt apps. Unless the app is exploiting some specific aspect of X11, all GTK (3 and up) and Qt (5 and up) apps work fine under Wayland.

    As for other toolkits, FLTK, Electron, and SDL apps run in Wayland too.

    And by “preferred”, I mean that these apps (like Thunar) will run natively on Wayland even if Xwayland is available.

    There are Wayland only toolkits now but not really any “modern” toolkits that do not support Wayland. When Thunar gets ported to GTK5, it will be Wayland only.

    Obviously ancient x11 specific stuff like XCB or Athena, and things built on them like Motif will require Xwayland or Xsatellite. So if you want to run, xv or motif nedit, you need those. This list includes GTK2 as well. But even they work well enough you may not notice. I mean, xeyes won’t track your mouse I guess.

    And just in case mentioning xeyes brings out the Wayland critics, you can build an xeyes app that works in Wayland. I think the Wayland Maker compositor project has one for example (WindowMaker in Wayland).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    Obviously ancient x11 specific stuff

    Well yeah... I was kind of asking whether Thunar is one of those things that haven't transitioned to a Wayland-enabled framework. Maybe it's still using GTK3 or something.

    Btw, is GTK5 in the works?? 😀

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    GTK 5 is not yet in the works to my knowledge.

    GTK 3 apps support Wayland natively. GIMP, for example, is GTK 3 and Wayland native.

    GTK 2 is X11 only if you use a distro that even ships GTK 2 anymore. Many do not, including mine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Gotcha!

    a distro [...] including mine

    Must not be Arch since you didn't mention you use Arch 😅, ...

    ... wwwiiich is what I use btw. I use Arch.

    /jk, probably not even funny, I slept like 6 hrs combined in the last 48 hrs...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago*

    What's actually missing from Nautilus and the GNOME file picker is a sane sort by type where the subsorting is by name, and not whatever GNOME chooses

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago* (14 children)

    The most exciting new thing in Gnome is a new shortcut in Nautilus. What has happened to the project?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    If it ain't broken, don't fix it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    I've heard "If it ain't broken, don't fix it." WAY TOO MANY times.
    If it ain't broken, it can be better; improve it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    I have to use too many extensions to make it usable. When we'll get proper multi monitor support with top bar settings?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    What's wrong with multi monitor?

    Gnome has been my example as the best multimonitor experience. It's more reliable than even my work Mac when working with mixed DPI and multiple displays.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago*

    I have to use "fullscreen avoider" and "multi-monitor panel" extensions.

    The first moves the top panel to the second monitor if there's a fullscreen window on the first.

    The second creates another top panel on all the others monitor.

    Since them are in effect different panels, others extensions doesn't show up on secondary monitor's top panel (like for example audio mixer). So by using "fullscreen avoider" I have those extensions on the secondary monitor while I'm gaming or watching a video.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Most of the exciting GNOME changes are in mutter rather than the shell.

    This release we got a lot of efficiency and performance improvements which are exciting but not news headline clickbait exciting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    I swapped to nemo, I like the plugins like the built in terminal

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment