1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 11 months ago

I can't even meme this, great work by Blue.

  • source
  • 11 comments in c/spaceflight@sh.itjust.works view that post
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    those spot weld things are really neat

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Wow! I am so impressed. Seems like they took a cautious trajectory and burned lots of fuel on the landing, but that looked great!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I guess escapade being tiny gave them a lot more margin

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    The Glenn's first stage can hover. Even nearly empty, the booster is heavy enough and the BE-4 can throttle low enough that it doesn't need to do a suicide burn. Instead, and as they just demonstrated, it can just gently lower itself down on the deck.

    Takes more prop to do so, but for a second attempt, the decision to play it safe was perfectly sound. It's practically guaranteed that they'll dial the margins in with more flights. This might be the softest landing that a New Glenn ever experiences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I wonder if they'll go with for full Falcon 9 style suicide burn at some point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I assume that's a method of using the minimum amount of thrust and time in the air? So, full blast at the last possible second?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Absolutely beautiful flight. The engineers deserve every bit of the pride they're feeling right now.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Congrats to the teams

  • source