With many Democratic base voters up in arms over Senate Democrats caving on the federal government shutdown fight, there have been calls for Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to step down from his leadership role.

None of those calls, however, have come from senators currently serving in the Democratic Caucus, including progressive stalwarts such as Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).

As reported by The American Prospect on Tuesday, no Democrats in the Senate have yet expressed support for replacing Schumer (D-NY) as leader, despite the fact that "every single one of them has the power to force a vote on Schumer’s continued control of the caucus" if they chose to do so.

According to the Prospect, any senator in the Democratic Caucus "could bring forward a motion to amend the Democratic Caucus Rules to say that he should lose his leadership position if a set number of members disapprove of him." What's more, the Prospect explained, "the motion would be 'self-executing,' resulting in Schumer’s removal at the same time that it’s approved."

As noted in a Politico report, Senate Democrats who were opposed to the shutdown cave did not directly criticize Schumer for his handling of the issue, and some, like Warren, tried to direct voters' anger toward Republicans.

"I want Republicans to actually grow a backbone and say, regardless of what [President] Donald Trump says, we’re actually going to restore these cuts on healthcare," she said on Sunday. "But it looks like I’ve lost that fight, so I don’t want to post more pain on people who are hungry and on people who haven’t been paid."

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) was more directly critical of the deal that Democrats cut on reopening the government, but he nonetheless stopped short of calling for Schumer's removal.

“This bill doesn’t do anything to arrest the healthcare catastrophe, nor does it constrain in any meaningful way President Trump’s illegality,” he said. “I think the voters were pretty clear on Tuesday night what they wanted Congress to do, and more specifically, what they wanted Democrats to do, and I am really saddened that we didn’t listen to them.”

The appetite for ditching Schumer appears much stronger among Democrats serving in the US House of Representatives, however.

Axios on Monday reported that House Democrats' anger at their Senate counterparts erupted during a private phone call among members, as Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-NM) told her colleagues that "people are fucking pissed" at seeing Democrats once again cave in a fight with Trump.

One anonymous Democrat also told Axios that almost "everyone [was] strongly against" the deal Senate Democrats cut to reopen the government without an agreement to extend enhanced tax credits for Americans who buy their health insurance through Affordable Care Act (ACA) exchanges.

Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), who is running a primary challenge against Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), called on Schumer to step down as minority leader, and challenged his opponent to do the same.

"If Chuck Schumer were an effective leader, he would have united his caucus to vote ‘No’ tonight and hold the line on healthcare," Moulton wrote in a social media post earlier this week. "Maybe now Ed Markey will finally join me in pledging not to vote for Schumer?”

Progressive advocacy organization Indivisible on Monday started ramping up pressure on Democrats to push for Schumer to step down as minority leader, and the group explicitly said that it would "not back any Senate primary candidate unless they call for Schumer to step down as Minority Leader."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 1 year ago

Because they ALL need to be primaried until we get folks that understand who they represent

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Why would they? Calling it now: he's planning to retire.

  • source
  • 12 comments in c/lefty_news@ibbit.at view that post
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    Because the Democrat money comes from people who support people like Chuck

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Senate Dems cannot simply call for Schumer to step down. One of them must take his place, which they can do by calling for and winning a simple majority vote. “Minority leader” is not a position in the Senate or a Constitutional position, like Speaker of the House or President of the Senate. It is only a position within their caucus, so the 48 of them are free to pick a new leader next time they meet. They could do it over Zoom if they want. If you want Schumer to step down, then convince one of his 47 peers to step up.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Because they were all approached by Chuck to see who didn't want to run again so they could be the sacrificial votes. Chuck Schumer needs to be removed if democracy will survive. If midterms mean anything, all establishment Dems need to be replaced with progressives and democratic socialists.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Because he keeps doing exactly what they want him to do. He does a bad job of pretending to care about the voters, then becomes the lightning rod for the whole party. Why would they call him to step down when his whole job is to protect them from the heat?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    My guess is nobody wants to be in his place.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    We need a full harassment campaign for Senate Democrats: nonstop calling, protests, etc

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Why would they? Calling it now: he's planning to retire.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If he's planning to retire, then why the scherade of voting no? Nah, I think he plans to fuck us over again by dying in office at some new crucial moment in the future.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 4 comments in c/politics@piefed.social view that post
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Maybe cuz they're beholden to the wealthy and don't really care about anyone other than themselves?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Be fair. The Republicans are very busy right now, and don't have time to tell the Democratic senators what to do yet. They're waiting for orders.

  • source