all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Today might be the day to buy that lotto ticket, my friend.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think so. I'll have to use the broccoli plu code for part of the numbers haha

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Speaking statistically, we can't know the odds of this specific weight without knowing the normal distribution of broccoli weights in that shop.

    Therefore, the degree of luck currently orbiting around you remains unknown!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    With or without the plastic?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    With the plastic. And I don't have a scale accurate enough to see if the bag would change it or not :/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Everything is exactly 1 of some dumb unit...

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's more dull in grams: 453.5924g

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Why would a grocery store have a scale that accurate?! Weird. I screw around with chemistry experiments in the house and 10ths of a gram is plenty close enough.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Because scales for commerce are calibrated by professionals. I imagine every jurisdiction has a Weights and Measures division that requires periodic checking, ostensibly to prevent consumers from being ripped off.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Time to go to your gas pump to fill up exactly some round number in your currency, without going over.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago
    [–] 2 points 1 year ago
    [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)