I see a lot of people recently calling Chamberlain "spineless" and saying that he "caved" to Hitler or "sold out Czechoslavakia in exchange for empty promises." But this is really problematic because you're not thinking of all the people who would've gotten hurt if this deal didn't go through. I mean, nobody wants a repeat of the Great War. And look, I hate Hitler as much as anyone, but he's given us his word that he'll be content with taking only the Sudetenla-

Sorry, what's that? Oh, I see.

As I was saying, Mr. Hitler has given us his word that he'll be content with just annexing all of Czechoslavakia.

What was he supposed to do? Throw Europe into a major conflict, just because some fascist seizes power, removes any semblance of democracy, and starts terrorizing minorities?

Look, at the end of the day, capitalist or fascist, we might not see eye to eye on every little detail but it's important to be the bigger person and reach across the aisle and give them every chance to stop being belligerent.

I mean, after all, if we can't work together, then who's going to kill all the leftists?

all 46 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 1 year ago

You can't write satire this subtle on Lemmy. People in the comments think you are actually defending Chamberlain.

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Chamberlain wanted peace above all. He was facing a political crisis at home and a still recovering economy from WW1.

    The peace deal with the Nazi wasn't spineless it was a lesson in what not to do when faced with fascism, something that perhaps needs to be relearned the hard way in modern times.

    It's documented that ultimately he felt like he had failed the country, indeed he never recovered politically.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 27 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    This is a shitpost, satirizing recent events in the US.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I'm a little dumb what's the recent event

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Several US Senators of the Democratic Party have expressed intent to end the current government shutdown without gaining the concessions the rest of the party has been demanding. Unfortunately, they're numerous enough (8) that they may be able to force the issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The deal to end the shutdown. Imo the Dems caved, getting very little in exchange.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The difference between the two, of course, was that at the time they thought Neville had really done it, and I can't even fathom even Schumer thinking he's done a great thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Schumer is still opposed to ending the shutdown to my knowledge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    What in the... Yeah you're right. I thought I had heard he was working on a deal and I'm so used to disappointment from him. The eight Dems are:

    • Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada
    • Dick Durbin of Illinois
    • John Fetterman of Pennsylvania
    • Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire
    • Tim Kaine of Virginia
    • Angus King of Maine
    • Jacky Rosen of Nevada
    • Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire

    Edit: Now I'm hearing possibilities that Schumer did mastermind this, and these eight were picked? Fuck it either way, still hate the guy for being such a schmuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    I think it's likely that the war may have played out very differently had Sudetenland not been given. Imho it, and the subsequent invasion gave have much more justification and support for a declaration than had he stood firm. As there would have been a large 'what if' crowd.

    I could be entirely wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (23 children)

    This is particularly funny considering your apologia for Russian imperialism in Ukraine.

    Of course, I'm sure had you been around at the time, you would have opposed Chamberlain then, as well - after all, the Soviets and the Nazis had a common enemy in the 'Western degenerates'. The Soviets couldn't well genocide Poland by themselves - though they certainly put in plenty of effort!

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [+] [S] -17 points 1 year ago (22 children)

    What the fuck are you even talking about. Stop following me around to other threads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago* (21 children)

    image

    This you licking fascist boots and spreading pro-fascist misinformation in the interests of 'Peace in our time! (under a fascist regime)', Mr. Chamberlain?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Thank you so much for uncovering all those Tankies. Without you, I had much less fun in the Threadiverse. Please keep at it, even with all the hate you are getting, be sure there are a lot of other people like me really appreciating what you are doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    They're much less common than they used to be back in 2023, at least on the 'decent' instances. Hopefully genocide denial will be completely dead on the non-tankie instances given a little more time!

    I hate seeing shit like this passed around, and the "Milk Before Meat" approach is how they soften their image, so I try to call it out when I see it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] [S] -10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I did a wrongthink 😔

    I'm so sorry. There are, in fact, three lights. I will never trust my own eyes ever again, I pledge to always follow whatever the group decides is correct and never again to think for myself or question what I'm told. I hearby renounce all standards of evidence and uphold the in-group's symbolic beliefs as the highest authority of epistemology. Will you ever forgive me?

    ...still on the shitpost comm, yeah?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -12 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    What the fuck are you talking about. Stop following me around to other threads.

    If you like talking to me so much, finish our other conversation by providing the evidence I asked. I'm not discussing anything else with you until then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    If you like talking to me so much, finish our other conversation by providing the evidence I asked.

    I never pretended to 'engage' with you about your continuing denial of the Uyghur Genocide, I only pointed out that you are, in fact, a genocide denier. :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] [S] -12 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Bruh that's literally you in the comic. Stop following me around. I'm trying to eat breakfast.

    Dumbass really thought "sealioning" meant, "asking for evidence, in any context" 😭😭😭

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Dumbass really thought “sealioning” meant, “asking for evidence, in any context” 😭😭😭

    Me: "You're a genocide denier."

    You: "It's not a genocide!"

    Me: "Yeah, that's exactly what I accused you of, thanks."

    You: "WHERE'S THE PROOF?!"

    lmao

    Just like Holocaust deniers. You hate being called out, but crave arguing about it, I suppose because the thought of murdered minorities gets your genocide-boner going.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Do you deny the ongoing US genocide of Italians? Yes or no. Do you deny the "white genocide?" Yes or no.

    Evidence or GTFO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)

    Evidence or GTFO.

    That comic is not an excuse for rejecting the entire concept of evidence lmao.

    Evidence or GTFO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Evidence or GTFO.

    Do you deny the "white genocide," yes or no?

    Evidence or GTFO.

    (That video is literally what you're doing in this thread lol)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    (That video is literally what you’re doing in this thread lol)

    Damn, so it's not just your literacy that's bad, but your media comprehension in general.

    Sorry that you think that explicitly refusing to debate you is asking you to debate me, lmao.

    Sorry that you think you're entitled to debate the well-recorded genocide of minorities with anyone who isn't a genocide denying piece of shit, a bizarre entitlement shared with the Holocaust deniers you ape.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Bro you come into this thread, guns blazing, attacking me and trying to get me into a debate, I tell you to leave me alone, and somehow I'm the one demanding you "debate me?" No, please, do not debate me. Please leave me alone. But if you are going to follow me around, attacking me and trying to get me to debate you, all I ask is one simple thing:

    Evidence or GTFO.

    That's it. If you're going to hurl accusations at me, then provide evidence that the things you're attacking me for denying are actually grounded in reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Bro you come into this thread, guns blazing, attacking me and trying to get me into a debate,

    I never tried to get you into a debate, lmao. I just pointed out the humor of a pro-imperialist genocide denier who advocates for appeasement pretending to be opposed to appeasement of imperialism and genocide. :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] -2 points 1 year ago

    You're still trying to get me into a debate, lol. You're still hurling accusations with no basis in reality. Because you will neither provide evidence, nor will you GTFO.

    Evidence, or GTFO.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Whenever anyone says Chamberlan "gave up" Czechoslovakia I ask one simple question: What was he supposed to do? He could have declared war, like the lion Churchill did for Poland. But I'll remind you that the only thing England sent to Poland was thoughts and prayers. Followed by over a year of "phony" war.

    Look at a map. You'll notice that Czechoslovakia is quite far from England. With fucking Germany in between!

    The whole Chamberlan meme is just right-wing propaganda to delegitimize diplomacy. It only makes sense if you don't think about it.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I will always come to the defence of Chamberlain from pop-history types.

    He actually saved the UK by massively rearming the country in the lead up to the war, especially so the RAF. If it wasn't for his actions we would have likely lost the battle for Britain.

    Also fun fact: at the time he was actually considered a war hawk by much of parliament and was pressured into being softer on Hitler than he wanted to.

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    No, Chamberlain was spineless, against the Royal Family.

    Czechia gave him a plan to crush the Nazis at the first stop, they baulked, since the prince loved Nazis.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    The prince who, by the time Chamberlain was PM, had already abdicated, had been cut off by the King and was living in exile in France with that American woman? Is there some alternate timeline you’re subscribed to?

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Leftists were on Hitlers side.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Is that why they literally fought him in the streets?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    A very small minority of them did probably less than 1%. It is insignificant when compared with the amount of leftists that fully sided with them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Do.you know what the Night of Long Knives was?

    Because you seem to know very little of actual history.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    Can you remind me how many leftists there were "fighting back" during the night of the long knives?

    Also can you please remind me if socialism was popular with Germany workers also how many people supported the social democratic party.

    Also please remind me of the number of citizens arrested for "resistance activities" the number of those that were communist or socialist and for good measure the population size of Germany at the time.

    And please advise what the population of the USSR was at the time.

  • source
  • parent