You can't write satire this subtle on Lemmy. People in the comments think you are actually defending Chamberlain.
post
Chamberlain wanted peace above all. He was facing a political crisis at home and a still recovering economy from WW1.
The peace deal with the Nazi wasn't spineless it was a lesson in what not to do when faced with fascism, something that perhaps needs to be relearned the hard way in modern times.
It's documented that ultimately he felt like he had failed the country, indeed he never recovered politically.
This is particularly funny considering your apologia for Russian imperialism in Ukraine.
Of course, I'm sure had you been around at the time, you would have opposed Chamberlain then, as well - after all, the Soviets and the Nazis had a common enemy in the 'Western degenerates'. The Soviets couldn't well genocide Poland by themselves - though they certainly put in plenty of effort!
What the fuck are you even talking about. Stop following me around to other threads.

This you licking fascist boots and spreading pro-fascist misinformation in the interests of 'Peace in our time! (under a fascist regime)', Mr. Chamberlain?
Thank you so much for uncovering all those Tankies. Without you, I had much less fun in the Threadiverse. Please keep at it, even with all the hate you are getting, be sure there are a lot of other people like me really appreciating what you are doing.
They're much less common than they used to be back in 2023, at least on the 'decent' instances. Hopefully genocide denial will be completely dead on the non-tankie instances given a little more time!
I hate seeing shit like this passed around, and the "Milk Before Meat" approach is how they soften their image, so I try to call it out when I see it.
I did a wrongthink 😔
I'm so sorry. There are, in fact, three lights. I will never trust my own eyes ever again, I pledge to always follow whatever the group decides is correct and never again to think for myself or question what I'm told. I hearby renounce all standards of evidence and uphold the in-group's symbolic beliefs as the highest authority of epistemology. Will you ever forgive me?
...still on the shitpost comm, yeah?
What the fuck are you talking about. Stop following me around to other threads.
If you like talking to me so much, finish our other conversation by providing the evidence I asked. I'm not discussing anything else with you until then.
If you like talking to me so much, finish our other conversation by providing the evidence I asked.

I never pretended to 'engage' with you about your continuing denial of the Uyghur Genocide, I only pointed out that you are, in fact, a genocide denier. :)
Bruh that's literally you in the comic. Stop following me around. I'm trying to eat breakfast.
Dumbass really thought "sealioning" meant, "asking for evidence, in any context" 😭😭😭
Dumbass really thought “sealioning” meant, “asking for evidence, in any context” 😭😭😭
Me: "You're a genocide denier."
You: "It's not a genocide!"
Me: "Yeah, that's exactly what I accused you of, thanks."
You: "WHERE'S THE PROOF?!"
lmao
Just like Holocaust deniers. You hate being called out, but crave arguing about it, I suppose because the thought of murdered minorities gets your genocide-boner going.
Do you deny the ongoing US genocide of Italians? Yes or no. Do you deny the "white genocide?" Yes or no.
Evidence or GTFO.
Evidence or GTFO.
That comic is not an excuse for rejecting the entire concept of evidence lmao.
Evidence or GTFO.
I'm sorry that you think you're entitled to a debate, genocide denier, like the Holocaust deniers you mimic
Oh, this is fucking RICH coming from you.
Evidence or GTFO.
Do you deny the "white genocide," yes or no?
Evidence or GTFO.
(That video is literally what you're doing in this thread lol)
(That video is literally what you’re doing in this thread lol)
Damn, so it's not just your literacy that's bad, but your media comprehension in general.
Sorry that you think that explicitly refusing to debate you is asking you to debate me, lmao.
Sorry that you think you're entitled to debate the well-recorded genocide of minorities with anyone who isn't a genocide denying piece of shit, a bizarre entitlement shared with the Holocaust deniers you ape.
Bro you come into this thread, guns blazing, attacking me and trying to get me into a debate, I tell you to leave me alone, and somehow I'm the one demanding you "debate me?" No, please, do not debate me. Please leave me alone. But if you are going to follow me around, attacking me and trying to get me to debate you, all I ask is one simple thing:
Evidence or GTFO.
That's it. If you're going to hurl accusations at me, then provide evidence that the things you're attacking me for denying are actually grounded in reality.
Bro you come into this thread, guns blazing, attacking me and trying to get me into a debate,
I never tried to get you into a debate, lmao. I just pointed out the humor of a pro-imperialist genocide denier who advocates for appeasement pretending to be opposed to appeasement of imperialism and genocide. :)
Whenever anyone says Chamberlan "gave up" Czechoslovakia I ask one simple question: What was he supposed to do? He could have declared war, like the lion Churchill did for Poland. But I'll remind you that the only thing England sent to Poland was thoughts and prayers. Followed by over a year of "phony" war.
Look at a map. You'll notice that Czechoslovakia is quite far from England. With fucking Germany in between!
The whole Chamberlan meme is just right-wing propaganda to delegitimize diplomacy. It only makes sense if you don't think about it.
I will always come to the defence of Chamberlain from pop-history types.
He actually saved the UK by massively rearming the country in the lead up to the war, especially so the RAF. If it wasn't for his actions we would have likely lost the battle for Britain.
Also fun fact: at the time he was actually considered a war hawk by much of parliament and was pressured into being softer on Hitler than he wanted to.
No, Chamberlain was spineless, against the Royal Family.
Czechia gave him a plan to crush the Nazis at the first stop, they baulked, since the prince loved Nazis.
Leftists were on Hitlers side.
Is that why they literally fought him in the streets?
A very small minority of them did probably less than 1%. It is insignificant when compared with the amount of leftists that fully sided with them.
Do.you know what the Night of Long Knives was?
Because you seem to know very little of actual history.
Can you remind me how many leftists there were "fighting back" during the night of the long knives?
Also can you please remind me if socialism was popular with Germany workers also how many people supported the social democratic party.
Also please remind me of the number of citizens arrested for "resistance activities" the number of those that were communist or socialist and for good measure the population size of Germany at the time.
And please advise what the population of the USSR was at the time.

all 46 comments