Why is Tylenol not suing RFK? I bet this is a ploy to help out a buddy who owns a competing pharmaceutical company. It's always a scheme with them.

Unless the judge is corrupt, Paxton will have to provide actual facts and evidence in order to win his ridiculous case. Merely calling acetaminophen a “possible” cause does not meet judicial standards. Unsupported crackpot guesses are not evidence. Neither are Facebook posts.

Unfortunately, J&J sucks, too. They just happen to have science on their side.

Lol! Cool. Show us the evidence behind these claims, then. This should be fascinating.

Having a quick look- the Tylenol packet says you should consult a doctor before taking if you're Pregnant.

So even if this crackpot 'Paracetamol gives you Autism' hoo ha was true (it isn't) - wouldn't the warning give them indemnity?