@Tutanota it's nice to see this "voting until successful" noble european custom is still practiced.recall what happen with the eu constitutional treaty and then with treaty of lisbon, and ireland case.

@Tutanota The opposition to Chat Control is the opposite of funded by big tech. What kind of benefit would they even get out of pushing against Chat Control?

@Tutanota Will not be surprised if we discover that this guy is sympathetic to the Russian president.

@Tutanota He even contradicts himself in the video... first he says it's not about the EU bodies conducting surveillance on your messages, then he says that some business partners are already voluntarily scanning material "by the millions of files" and reporting it... of course to the EU bodies.

@Tutanota enemy of the people

@Tutanota If I was paid I would be richer than him come on

@Tutanota that creepy motherfucker. Resist this madness!

@Tutanota let’s try and find his obvious financial connection to implementing chat control. There is no chance in hell he is not acting for personal profit

@Tutanota I feel like if someone's being paid off by tech companies it's the danish government.For some reason, something that keeps happening lately is spy tech companies lobbying governmnents behind closed doors to make their tech legally mandatory because otherwise no one would be interested in it and their whole business model would be illegal anyways.

@TutanotaResistance to the surveillance state, paid for by Big Tech, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Palantir, etc.It's politicians like him that give liars a bad name.

@Tutanota Sehr schön, mal sehen wann es wieder auf dem Tisch liegt, dieses nervige Thema. Die sollen sich mal um wichtigeres und die wirklich harten Dinge in unserer Gesellschaft kümmern, wie z.B. Falschparker. 🤭

@Tutanota To be honest, he’s the one who sounds like he’s been paid by Big Tech.

@Tutanota I don't know that guy, but I already know he's an asshole.

Peter Hummelgaard also wants to give the Danish police almost unrestricted access to data on Danes.And in my experience as a Dane most of us really do not like him for it.

@Tutanota He's claiming that smashing privacy is a socialist move? Is he for real?! Is Denmark for real?!

@Tutanota Just to give my two €cents as a Dane:Anyone who understands anything agrees he is an idiot.A Social Democrat by name, but in a coalition government where appearing decisive and tough is a huge priority.

@Tutanota My activism was paid for by me! ✊

@Tutanota estos cabezas de nabo no entienden NADA.

@Tutanota what an eejit

@Tutanota Right, because citizens wouldn't care at all about their privacy. 🙄(This toot brought to you by Big Tech)

@Tutanota Peter Hummelgaard continues to amaze!!But I think there is reason to be concerned:- What or who makes him believe that it is now possible to implement? Has anything changed? - A rewriting of the proposal so that it APPEARS acceptablePeter Hummelgaard does not believe the battle is over...... well it is not...

@Tutanota Let's first read his private chat history of the past year before voting; I wouldn't be surprised to discover he's the one being bribed.

@Tutanota Listen, all the Danish gvmnt is talking about all the f---ing time is how bad immigrants are, at every opportunity they find. They couldn't care less about CSAM, Chat control is to find out whether Muhammad from Bangladesh, who came to study, is actually just trying to get into the job market, because he cannot pay rent because the Danish government is busy with this surveillance bullshit instead of the important matters.

Remember, this is the guy who also said: "We must break with the totally erroneous perception that it is everyone's civil liberty to communicate on encrypted messaging services."

@Tutanota ironic, since Big Tech would like nothing more than scanning every single message and file. It's hilarious to think that they would pay people to lobby against chat control