all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 1 year ago

5 second time penalty awarded to the hackers after stewards enquiry.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    β€œHack” is a very strong word here. They asked the website if they could be admin and the website happily said yes and made them admins.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I agree, but I also think the researchers should be awarded a hefty bounty for knowing which part of the website to ask.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Oh definitely. They found a glaring vulnerability, it just doesn’t mean they hacked it. An equivalent would be somebody paying a pen testing team to see what they can do and the team finds an open window into the accounting office and they climb in, put a note on the desk stating that the pen testing team needs to get paid three times as much, and then accounting does it no questions asked after they find the note.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Not even surprised considering the FIA.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    This blog is part 1 of 3 in a series of vulnerabilities found in Formula 1.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago