all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

it's missing the words "authoritarian" and "dictator" lol

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    libs can't comprehend a democratic system within a single pluralistic party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Where’s Tankman? You know the reactionary who left China after the tiannanmen square thing

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    This is a Dutch investigative piece (English subtitles available) made by the Dutch government funded TV program 'Nieuwsuur'. Before you start bashing on it for it being biased because the TV program is government funded, a lot of Dutch politicians at the time strongly wanted to increase our trade agreements with China, this item was actively hindering that.

    https://youtu.be/ixdGGZ4Nof0

    I get disliking a lot of the 'American exceptionalism' you see on some corners of the internet, but one must also be cautious of not accidentally creating your own 'Chinese exceptionalism'. There is actual concrete proof that this is happening in China. This is of course not the fault of the Chinese people, this is government policy, not the fault of the whole Chinese people. But if we become to cautious to speak up about issues like these, they will keep occurring in all parts of the world.

    I don't think I'll be able to convince anyone in here, but due to me more and more frequently spotting posts about these on my Lemmy feed, I was itching to speak up about it.

  • source
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago

    "Small-brained American" YT channel went to the uygher part of China. It's definitely a police state. He was tailed the entire time. They are tearing down the older uygher ruins and building Disneyland equivalents for tourism. The whole history and culture is being commodified in the same way America is like "Mexicans wear sombreros LOL". The only difference is it's 2025. It's definitely presented as "We are Chinese and people that weren't Chinese lived here at some point but we're all Chinese now". No one answers any political questions either.

  • source