top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 143 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Hey he's not a terrorist! He's a war criminal and a genocider. Please.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    He is absolutely a terrorist also. He fits every definition of one.

    Side point but where does this "one-upper" tendency come from? Just let people describe things in terms that make sense to them. This isn't twitter, there's no reason to contradict them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I would think that genocide is some order of magnitude worse than terrorist (which is obviously very shitty to begin with), so I would like to make it clear that Bibi is somewhere at the top of my personal ranking of shit people.

    But terrorist is fine (if I may say so), too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    He is responsible for a genocide in Gaza and possibly in the West Bank but also a terrorist in the other countries they are attacking like the pager attacks that killed children and other innocents in collateral damage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I mean, blowing up aid vans and air striking refugee encampments is pretty terrorist-y

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Fair enough. Terrorist and war criminal and genocidist then

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 9 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    It is just different levels of specificity really. I found the meme and didn't think to edit it. I think terrorist would be applicable especially for the pager attack, Doha strike on negotiators, attacks of Iranian scientists, etc. Maybe you should look up the Mossad use of terrorism if you are not aware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Hey, hey, hey... That's fucked up; you can't just call someone a 'genocider' lile thaf...

    It's genocid*-ist*

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Netanyahu claimed foreign leaders who “public condemn us privately thank us. They tell me how much they value Israel’s superb intelligence services that have prevented, time and again, terrorist attacks in their capitals.” He did not say which countries’ leaders had privately thanked him.

    “So Benjamin, are those leaders in the room with us right now?”

    Even the US pulled their senior diplomats who’d normally be there and sent the interns instead lmao

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    He's not trying to say that their Intel service has helped. He's trying to emphasize "privacy" and "Israeli intelligence service" to remind people that Mossad has dirt on them, without literally saying that, imo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] [S] 97 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Mass UN walkout when Netanyahu started speaking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It took them a really long time to realize. I remember getting ridiculed by dems last year for criticizing Israel.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    usamericans when they see a terrorist:

    Stock photo of a white man looking at himself in a mirror

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Where is that parody video of the top event where they announce Netanyahu as a baby killer

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    That's a fascist.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's not all Americans just the people they pay to represent them. Also I think the other half remained seated, or refused to show up.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    I’m not yet ready to cede the term “American” to those who would support genocide.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yeah, I use USAmerican to differentiate it from the rest of the American nations.

    AmeriKKKan is also acceptable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    USA has a horrible history of genocide and disruption and imperialism and all that of course—still have found “AmeriKKKa” to be cringe for some reason IDK why

    Maybe cuz folks who’ve used it haven’t been eloquent or something? Seriously not sure here, again USA has committed countless crimes and def has Ku Klux Klan in its history

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Did you miss, like, the last 500 years or something?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It wasn’t Americans who invaded America…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    How many genocided peoples called it America before the colonizers started killing them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I mean… Japan isn’t called Japan in Japanese either. Unfortunately we don’t speak Mayan, or Incan, or Cherokee, or etc.…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)