all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

Because owning music and paying once, is way better than paying every month and listening to the same popular tracks again and again.

Yes I know, Spotify has tons of tracks available, still, I like to go through my CDs and play it right away, no internet needed, no ads, no algorithms.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I like Bandcamp, as I get to listen to whole tracks (a few times each), get to download and own them at $1 to $2 each.

    I don't spend much more than a Spotify subscription and now own so many wonderful tracks I can listen to anytime.

    And most of what I spend goes directly to the artist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    ...own them at $1 to $2 each.

    Do you actually recieve DRM free files or are they still tied to Bandcamp? I understand we still don't own the song with physical media but a policy change or new license deal at Colombia isn't going to make the disc disappear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    i get it, but it takes up so much room. I had thousands of CDs. Maybe over 9,000. But I live in a townhouse and there just isn't room to keep all that shit, especially if you want to do the same thing for other media like blu rays, games, vinyl or whatever else.

    Personally, i find other ways to enjoy music and movies in a physical/visual form like prints, posters, and apparel.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/music@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Simply because online has proven to be unreliable. You "buy" something, spend money, and one day someone decides they don't want to uphold their part, and shuts down the servers, leaving the customers without the product they paid for.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Enshittification

    • more ads
    • more cost
    • more buffering
    • no ff/rwd without more ads
    • discovery algorithms changed for profit instead of being useful
    • I told you so - lost “purchases” when a service loses a license or goes bankrupt
    • more buffer
    • why the eff are they pushing Joe Rogan again?
  • source
  • 2 comments in c/physicalmedia@sh.itjust.works view that post
    [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Kinda rings true. I now have a CD player in my car and living room, but I'm not interested in carrying around a bulky discman again.

    Listening to the albums of my youth has mostly lost its charm though. I think I'm mostly just nostalgic and missing my old friends.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago

    I haven't tried it but it feels like the bulk of the actual CDs (or even worse, the casettes) would be the worst of it. I have a vinyl player but the collection is shamefully small.

    Maybe it's just nostalgia as you say. But there's nothing wrong to give into that feeling every once in a while is there?

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/music@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Simply because online has proven to be unreliable. You "buy" something, spend money, and one day someone decides they don't want to uphold their part, and shuts down the servers, leaving the customers without the product they paid for.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Enshittification

    • more ads
    • more cost
    • more buffering
    • no ff/rwd without more ads
    • discovery algorithms changed for profit instead of being useful
    • I told you so - lost “purchases” when a service loses a license or goes bankrupt
    • more buffer
    • why the eff are they pushing Joe Rogan again?
  • source