all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 1 year ago*

Honestly, I'm more interested in reliability and mechanisms to prevent data loss...

Last I checked, the exFAT implementation that MS released to the public was missing some key features that made the Linux port less reliable, particularly for removable storage devices (making it not much better than old school FAT). Has that been fixed already?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Can someone explain to me how and when such a patch would make it into distros? For instance I'm running Debian 12, I'm guessing this won't get added since they just released 13, so this will be put in to version 14 at some point? Or are kernel updates seperate from the distribution development?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This probably won’t have much impact for most use cases, though.

    Yeah, I'm assuming it only affects operations on exFAT systems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It really varies by the distro's policies. If it gets into 6.18, for most distributions that means the next release that hasn't had its version freeze will get it. For Ubuntu and its variants, if there are release candidates of 6.18 at the time of the kernel freeze for 25.10 then 25.10 will probably get it. Otherwise we'll have to wait for 26.04.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    3 comments in c/linux@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    That's what I love about linux! Instead of bloat, we get awesome optimizations like this here and there.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)