top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 26 points 1 year ago

It's true! If they hadn't waited for permission from the U.S. to help Ukraine, Ukraine would be in Moscow by now.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yes, true.

    US would have wanted Ukraine's faster capitulation, because their president is Russian asset being blackmailed by decades of pedo stuff and pee tapes.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] -7 points 1 year ago

    I'd say there is some truth in that; Russia has gained momentum and Pokrovsk will very likely fall soon — Europe isn't aiding Ukraine because it cares about the people there, let's establish that, they've shown their humanity with Gaza, they have their own imperialistic aims — to prevent this they need American support —more so since Russia's state run military complex is outdoing the EU's production combined — which will, in my opinion, only start another American war that never goes anywhere, only bringing suffering to Ukrainians. Ukrainian army's morale is down, at least from what I hear, recruitment is forced, protests are breaking out, Zelensky isn't getting re-elected after the war ends and he says he won't give one inch of land; the war will persist, should he surrender? I don't know, I'm not the Ukrainian people, but I don't know what else they can do right now. I just hope the Ukrainian people won't suffer.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/europeanfederalists@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    As a US citizen, maybe we should do something about our own dictator before we try distracting from the Epstein files.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Meh. Nobody takes us Americans seriously anymore anyway, so what of it?

  • source