A snippet from a New York Times article shared on tumblr. It says: "Most experts acknowledge that a takeover by artificial intelligence is coming for the video game industry within the next five years, and executives have already started preparing to restructure their companies in anticipation. After all, it was one of the first sectors to deploy A.I. programming in the 1980s, with the four ghosts who chase Pac-Man each responding differently to the player's real-time movements.".   The post has the caption: "Is this seriously the level of journalism the NYT now tolerates."

top 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 77 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm sceptical about AI programming Pacman, but it's fairly obvious that the New York Times is leaning into AI journalism ..

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Not that long ago the algorithms that controlled the enemies in video was called AI, that's what they trying to mislead with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Oh god, it only gets worse the further down the article you go.

    ethics experts remain focused on questions of how prepared the industry is for sentient characters [emphasis mine]

    😐

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    When an AI character dies, what are the moral implications?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago

    It's always such a red flag in news articles when they mention vague "experts" but don't explain who they are. The Guardian is so bad for it, even though they're the most tolerable of the mainstream British options. A lot of the age verification stuff was a vague "experts say this will help" but if you dig deeper the experts end up being someone who's went from working as an MP to being appointed to some directorship of a charity, and not someone with technical skills that could explain the cybersecurity issues, easy circumventing via VPN etc.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah but will a ghost from pac-man tell me it loves me and get me to divorce my wife???*

    *yes, actually. Pinky is moving in next month

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The bastard. The absolute bastard.

    Pinky is a disloyal slut. It should have been just the two of us.

    This is how I fucking find out!?!? (⁠ノ⁠`⁠Д⁠´⁠)⁠ノ⁠彡⁠┻⁠━⁠┻

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I predicted a year or two ago that at some point calculators will be referred to as AI.

    We're getting ever closer...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Ti needs to start marketing themselves as the Grandfather of Ai then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago*

    It’s a cheaper way to make games, but it is going to cost you 5,000 times more to run a game.

    They're doing pay later in games. xD

    in other media:
    https://www.vice.com/en/article/is-ai-coming-for-video-games-next/
    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ai-games-faster-cheaper-better-201128605.html
    https://futurism.com/demo-video-game-characters-panic-code-matrix

    I like how the article evolves from demo video game to apocalypse.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Nuance doesn't put food on the table in the third yacht.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    Use the AI to replace project managers, scrum Masters, and 99% of the management. Keep the talent. If you work at a video game development company and you can't actively contribute to the game, seems like AI could do your job and you can go pull yourself up by your bootstraps find different work.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    "shall we ask an expert?"

    "Nah lets just make some shit up"

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I have no doubt this is what the CEOs think and that they will try, but fat chance lmao

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    And the authors name was Claude Anthropic.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Honestly a more accurate comparison to how LLMs work than what we usually hear, ie: "God".

  • source