Correlation does not always mean causation
post
New study
Replication please
13 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
Isn't it a thing where cancer survivors or family of cancer survivors run marathons?
So wouldn't it make sense that a population that's more prone to cancer, running marathons, would be more prone to cancerous anomalies than the general public?
[deleted]
replies:
N = 100 - there may be some signal there, BUT much larger numbers would be needed to confirm.
all 2 comments