NASA astronaut Nichole Ayers captured a stunning photograph of one of nature's most elusive phenomena from the International Space Station on July 3, 2025, initially believing she had documented a sprite, a rare form of atmospheric lightning, only to discover she had captured something even more extraordinary: a gigantic jet.

"Nichole Ayers caught a rare and spectacular form of a TLE from the International Space Station — a gigantic jet," confirmed Dr. Burcu Kosar, Principal Investigator of NASA's Spritacular project. The discovery represents one of the clearest views of this atmospheric phenomenon ever documented from space.

all 62 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 81 points 1 year ago (10 children)
  • [–] 145 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    From the website:

    Gigantic jets are a powerful type of electrical discharge that extends from the top of a thunderstorm into the upper atmosphere. They are typically observed by chance — often spotted by airline passengers or captured unintentionally by ground-based cameras aimed at other phenomena. Gigantic jets appear when the turbulent conditions at towering thunderstorm tops allow for lightning to escape the thunderstorm, propagating upwards toward space. They create an electrical bridge between the tops of the clouds (~20 km) and the upper atmosphere (~100 km), depositing a significant amount of electrical charge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Thank you! Can’t believe I had to scroll this far for an explanation. So then, are all those other patches of light also electrical storms?

    Also what is a sprite in this context?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 33 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    The other patches of light are cities. Lightning isn't as grainy looking. The exposure time of the shot is short so the image doesn't blur as the station moves, so the chances are stacked against getting two flashes in the one image.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago
    [–] 41 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I wish every magical-thinking person would just put like 50% more effort in and actually learn about science, because it's so much cooler when you know it's actually real and why it's happening.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I wish every magical-thinking person would join the reality-based community.

    I wish the magical-thinking community were not treated like adults and given the ability to vote. That's just carelessness with our Democracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I knew lightning could strike horizontally and downward. But never realized it could go up. That just seems so weird to me.

    I guess it’s less strange than ball lightning though. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_lightning

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I wonder where we can get a higher res picture. It bums me out these articles that talk about a nasa photo never seem to link to a the source images.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Pretty much the norm. You know they have a higher res and its probably available if you know the magic url for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago
    [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    How are astronauts not just constantly shitting themselves in fear?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    You cannot poo in zero gravity. They have to dig around up there with their hands to manually remove excrement from their rectum

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I don't know if this is true, but I'm certainly going to repeat it as fact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Well allow me to fix some mistakes. they can't poo normally, really, or it's rather hard. peristalsis probably works differently too, although it doesn't rely on gravity per se.

    Anyway, first off, it's not 0 g, it's "microgravity", because technically if we're being pedantic, there's nowhere in the universe where there's literally zero G as it's kinda everywhere, but even less so for the people on the space station, they just happen to be in synchronous freefall with the station, indefinitely, which basically is the same as no gravity subjectively, but anyway.

    They poop into walls nowadays, and apparently, no need for any manual helping. But @Flax_vert@feddit.uk there isn't honestly completely wrong, even if he meant it as a joke. I don't know how much you know about this, Flax, but here's where you hit home:

    "There's a problem of separation," Roberts said. "Whatever comes out of you doesn't know it's supposed to come away from you." Each fecal collection bag came with a "finger cot" to allow the astronauts to manually move things along. Then they had to knead a germicide into their waste so that gas-expelling bacteria wouldn't flourish inside the sealed bag and cause it to explode.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    I wish you hadn’t... But thanks. lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It was enlightening. However, I assure you I'll only remember that astronauts dig into their bootyholes to scoop their poops.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    NASA can't fool me. That's a demon summoning if I've ever seen one.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    TLE? Did I miss the definition? Would be nice to have it in the body text.

    Edit: went to the article which thankfully someone else posted. Transient Luminous Event is a TLE.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Space lightning is a far better name, IMHO.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Cool, a new wallpaper

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Sorry everyone, I knew trying everything on the taco bell menu was a bad idea but I couldn't stop

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Looks like the second impact

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    So, does anyone have an idea of where on Earth we're looking at?

    Anytime I look at images from the ISS, I try to identify cities, landmarks, or even a cardinal direction. I'm not very good at it...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Pretty sure someone's just opened a portal to hell.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (7 children)

    Serious question.

    If we could harness these lightning strikes and convert them into usable electricity. Would it change our planet? Would it drain the planet of some force of energy keeping us alive?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I doubt it, lightning strikes are just static discharges

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Right but energy doesn't end it just changes forms. Surely lightning has effects in our entire planet in some form or fashion we may or may not know about yet or it wouldn't be here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [B] 3 points 1 year ago

    Not a physicist, but here is my understanding.

    It shouldn't. We can't store that much energy with current technology. Energy can't be created or destroyed, so we would be using it for some other purpose and converting it to something else. Lightning strikes help in the nitrogen cycle, but that happens in the air. I doubt this would be impacted by us capturing the energy.

    If we are able to store that much energy, we would be advanced enough to keep our planet safe, hopefully. It will bring different problems. Somewhat related to this, you should read about Kardashev scale and Dyson spheare.

    Putting up wind farms should have more impact since it can change wind patterns, but the new wind turbines might be a lot better.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I don't think we could ever take so much energy that we'd suck the planet dry of it. I think a lot of the energy comes from solar energy through to our atmosphere or sumthing and there's a lot of solar energy probably.

    Im really dumb tho so probably dont read this post unless its too late because this disclaimer is the second paragraph.

  • source
  • parent