no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
12 comments in c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk view that post
[–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Huge respect on standing one's ground like this.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • This is actually GNU/veryFuckingCool

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I salute the student's morality and character. I recently had the displeasure of having a chapter published in an academic book. The entire process was badly orchestrated on proprietary software, about which i whined incessantly. Thankfully my contribution was all undertaken on foss. I took the opportunity to introduce and explain foss and the ethical merits, but don't expect any enlightenment. Education sector/industry is rotten to the core. Typically they justify their immorality with "we must teach and prepare the students on the software they will use in industry." Feckless clowns.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    The point about independent instances of Jitsi reminded me how dumb it is that every single university with a CS program doesn't host their own Jitsi instance instead of paying for enterprise licenses on teams et al... most already do their own moodle if I'm not mistaken so shouldn't be a stretch.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Firefox’s ECMAScript/JavaScript implementation (SpiderMonkey) is FOSS. I understand the fingerprinting consideration, but saying that it’s non-free is not accurate. Maybe they mean the scripts that sites themselves serve?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The link is broken, so let me ask here: What was so hard about this to begin with? Some specific software they use in some specific course?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    OP has already answered what was written in the article, but I don't think I could've finished uni if I refused to use proprietary software. We had to use matlab for one course, xilinx for another, android studio for another, visual studio for another (as in: actually learn how to use visual studio specifics), DaVinci configurator etc etc.

    Outside of mathematics and general IT courses, we were always required to use a proprietary tool. It sucks that universities force you to do that, but sometimes there isn't really another option if the industry is like that. Uni cannot prepare you for automotive software engineering without showing you the tools that are used, and they are all proprietary. Hopefully this changes on day.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Strange, it works for me. So I've pasted it into the OP if you still want to read it.

    Basically, use of proprietary software and services was demanded at all levels (doing tasks, submitting assignments, attending online classes, completing forms etc), especially as the pandemic picked up. Lecturers would often refuse or not even respond to his requests to use free alternatives, and some would count his not being in a Zoom or Skype meeting as an absence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 2 comments in c/freesoftware@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Why use double negation? A better title would be: "How I Fought To Graduate Using Only Free Software.

    Anyway, good article. :)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment