2
UK social media ban expansion for under-16s could cover YouTube Kids (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 10 hours ago by to c/UnitedKingdom@europe.pub
1 comment fedilink hide all child comments

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 10 hours ago

Seems like overkill. Sledgehammer for a walnut

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    4 comments in c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk view that post
    [–] 7 points 10 hours ago

    This is a sledgehammer for a walnut. Soon we'll all have to use real world ID to access the internet, which will be further walled off by having to ask AI instead of doing a search

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

    Tell that to any parent with an autistic child and they will tell you to fuck off

    YouTube kids is 20 minutes of relief

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

    I mean that isn't exactly the talking point I would want to use against age verification… We don't have to dispute that calming children down with videos isn't especially good for their development in order to argue against censorship and against keeping young people from having fun, having access to information, and socializing.

    ETA: and provided that the parent has verified their age, it doesn't affect that scenario anyway, so, huh

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • 2 comments in c/DeclineIntoCensorship@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 1 point 8 hours ago (1 child)

    Not to defend the ongoing bullcrap with the age verification but if you look at what child videos Youtube has to offer this would be better off to be banned from the entire Planet. Just cheap brainrot animation series that aim to keep kids locked in.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •